» Articles » PMID: 8064246

Empirical Generality of Data from Recognition Memory Receiver-operating Characteristic Functions and Implications for the Global Memory Models

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 1994 Jul 1
PMID 8064246
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The experiments presented in this article examined the slope of the zeta-ROC (receiver-operating characteristic) function for recognition memory. The slope was examined as a function of strength and the variables study time, list length, word frequency, and category membership. For normal distributions of familiarity, the slope of the zeta-ROC is the ratio of the new-item to old-item standard deviations. R. Ratcliff, C.-F. Sheu, and S. D. Gronlund (1992) found that the slope was constant within standard error as a function of strength of encoding, which is inconsistent with the predictions of the global memory models. The results presented here extend this finding: The slope was constant as a function of strength of encoding, list length, and the number of related items from a category in the study list. Word frequency did affect the slope, but within a frequency class the slope was constant as a function of strength. The implications of these data for the global memory models, the attention likelihood model, and variants of these models are discussed.

Citing Articles

Sometimes memory misleads: Variants of the error-speed effect strengthen the evidence for systematically misleading memory signals in recognition memory.

Voormann A, Rothe-Wulf A, Meyer-Grant C, Klauer K Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):294-305.

PMID: 38954156 PMC: 11836095. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02534-z.


Greater target or lure variability? An exploration on the effects of stimulus types and memory paradigms.

Chen H, Heathcote A, Sauer J, Palmer M, Osth A Mem Cognit. 2023; 52(3):554-573.

PMID: 38049675 PMC: 11021254. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-023-01483-7.


Does variability in recognition memory scale with mean memory strength or encoding variability in the UVSD model?.

Spanton R, Berry C Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022; 76(9):2037-2052.

PMID: 36274514 PMC: 10467009. DOI: 10.1177/17470218221136498.


The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.

Shekhar M, Rahnev D Psychol Rev. 2020; 128(1):45-70.

PMID: 32673034 PMC: 7883626. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000249.


Modeling list-strength and spacing effects using version 3 of the retrieving effectively from memory (REM.3) model and its superimposition-of-similar-images assumption.

Ensor T, Surprenant A, Neath I Behav Res Methods. 2020; 53(1):4-21.

PMID: 31898291 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01324-z.