» Articles » PMID: 35266744

Visual Metacognition: Measures, Models, and Neural Correlates

Overview
Journal Am Psychol
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35266744
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visual metacognition is the ability to evaluate one's performance on visual perceptual tasks. The field of visual metacognition unites the long tradition of visual psychophysics with the younger field of metacognition research. This article traces the historical roots of the field and reviews progress in the areas of (a) constructing appropriate measures of metacognitive ability, (b) developing computational models, and (c) revealing the neural correlates of visual metacognition. First, I review the most popular measures of metacognitive ability with an emphasis on their psychophysical properties. Second, I examine the empirical targets for modeling, the dominant modeling frameworks and the assumed computations underlying visual metacognition. Third, I explore the progress on understanding the neural correlates of visual metacognition by focusing on anatomical and functional studies, as well as causal manipulations. What emerges is a picture of substantial progress on constructing measures, developing models, and revealing the neural correlates of metacognition, but very little integration between these three areas of inquiry. I then explore the deep, intrinsic links between the three areas of research and argue that continued progress requires the recognition and exploitation of these links. Throughout, I discuss the implications of progress in visual metacognition for other areas of metacognition research, and pinpoint specific advancements that could be adopted by researchers working in other subfields of metacognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Automatic multisensory integration follows subjective confidence rather than objective performance.

Gao Y, Xue K, Odegaard B, Rahnev D Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):38.

PMID: 40069314 PMC: 11896883. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00221-w.


Do Young Children Use Verbal Disfluency as a Cue to Their Own Confidence?.

West E, Baer C, Yu L, Odic D Dev Sci. 2025; 28(3):e13617.

PMID: 40045535 PMC: 11883146. DOI: 10.1111/desc.13617.


A comprehensive assessment of current methods for measuring metacognition.

Rahnev D Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):701.

PMID: 39814749 PMC: 11735976. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56117-0.


The neural network RTNet exhibits the signatures of human perceptual decision-making.

Rafiei F, Shekhar M, Rahnev D Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(9):1752-1770.

PMID: 38997452 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01914-8.


Reliable, rapid, and remote measurement of metacognitive bias.

Fox C, McDonogh A, Donegan K, Teckentrup V, Crossen R, Hanlon A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14941.

PMID: 38942811 PMC: 11213917. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64900-0.


References
1.
Rahnev D, Fleming S . How experimental procedures influence estimates of metacognitive ability. Neurosci Conscious. 2019; 2019(1):niz009. PMC: 6556214. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niz009. View

2.
Rademaker R, Pearson J . Training Visual Imagery: Improvements of Metacognition, but not Imagery Strength. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:224. PMC: 3392841. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00224. View

3.
Baird B, Smallwood J, Gorgolewski K, Margulies D . Medial and lateral networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and perception. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(42):16657-65. PMC: 6618531. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0786-13.2013. View

4.
Samaha J, Barrett J, Sheldon A, LaRocque J, Postle B . Dissociating Perceptual Confidence from Discrimination Accuracy Reveals No Influence of Metacognitive Awareness on Working Memory. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:851. PMC: 4893488. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00851. View

5.
Janowsky J, Shimamura A, Kritchevsky M, Squire L . Cognitive impairment following frontal lobe damage and its relevance to human amnesia. Behav Neurosci. 1989; 103(3):548-60. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.103.3.548. View