» Articles » PMID: 19145736

Combination Testing for Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease: Comparison of Multiplex Immunoassay and ELISA Methods

Overview
Date 2009 Jan 16
PMID 19145736
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tissue transglutaminase (TTG) antibodies and newly developed deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibodies have better accuracy than native gliadin antibodies. Multiplex immunoassay (MIA) measures multiple antibodies simultaneously providing a complete antibody phenotype with reduced turnaround time and cost.

Aim: To evaluate the agreement between MIA and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test results for coeliac autibodies in biopsy-proven coeliac patients and controls and to model the diagnostic utility of combination testing.

Methods: We compared the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MIA and ELISA methods for TTG and DGP antibodies in mainly adult untreated coeliac patients (n = 92) and controls (n = 124).

Results: There was excellent agreement and a significant correlation between the results of MIA and ELISA methods (k > 0.8, r > 0.7) for all tests, except IgG. Diagnostic indices of individual and combination tests measured by the MIA method did not differ significantly from those measured by ELISA. The combination tests slightly increased sensitivity (if any test was positive) and specificity (if all tests were positive) compared to the individual tests.

Conclusions: Multiplex immunoassay testing for antibodies is as accurate as ELISA for coeliac disease diagnosis and has practical advantages over ELISA method. Rational combination testing can help identify patients who need intestinal biopsy and may reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Citing Articles

Dynamics of Serologic Change to Gluten in Celiac Disease Patients.

Syage J, Ramos A, Loskutov V, Norum A, Bledsoe A, Choung R Nutrients. 2023; 15(24).

PMID: 38140342 PMC: 10746107. DOI: 10.3390/nu15245083.


Gamma-gliadin specific celiac disease antibodies recognize p31-43 and p57-68 alpha gliadin peptides in deamidation related manner as a result of cross-reaction.

Dios A, Elek R, Szabo I, Horvath S, Gyimesi J, Kiraly R Amino Acids. 2021; 53(7):1051-1063.

PMID: 34059947 PMC: 8241804. DOI: 10.1007/s00726-021-03006-7.


Celiac disease: Understandings in diagnostic, nutritional, and medicinal aspects.

Ben Houmich T, Admou B Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2021; 35:20587384211008709.

PMID: 33878915 PMC: 8064516. DOI: 10.1177/20587384211008709.


Cochlear Proteins Associated with Noise-induced Hearing Loss: An Update.

Jain R, Pingle S, Tumane R, Thakkar L, Jawade A, Barapatre A Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2018; 22(2):60-73.

PMID: 30319226 PMC: 6176698. DOI: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_43_18.


Celiac Disease: Diagnostic Standards and Dilemmas.

Kaswala D, Veeraraghavan G, Kelly C, Leffler D Diseases. 2017; 3(2):86-101.

PMID: 28943611 PMC: 5548238. DOI: 10.3390/diseases3020086.


References
1.
Schwertz E, Kahlenberg F, Sack U, Richter T, Stern M, Conrad K . Serologic assay based on gliadin-related nonapeptides as a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic aid in celiac disease. Clin Chem. 2004; 50(12):2370-5. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.036111. View

2.
Stern M . Comparative evaluation of serologic tests for celiac disease: a European initiative toward standardization. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001; 31(5):513-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005176-200011000-00012. View

3.
Kakar S, Nehra V, Murray J, Dayharsh G, Burgart L . Significance of intraepithelial lymphocytosis in small bowel biopsy samples with normal mucosal architecture. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98(9):2027-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07631.x. View

4.
Rostom A, Murray J, Kagnoff M . American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006; 131(6):1981-2002. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004. View

5.
Fasano A, Catassi C . Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease: an evolving spectrum. Gastroenterology. 2001; 120(3):636-51. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2001.22123. View