» Articles » PMID: 19078960

Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in Vivo Controls Neural Crest Directional Migration

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Dec 17
PMID 19078960
Citations 297
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contact inhibition of locomotion was discovered by Abercrombie more than 50 years ago and describes the behaviour of fibroblast cells confronting each other in vitro, where they retract their protrusions and change direction on contact. Its failure was suggested to contribute to malignant invasion. However, the molecular basis of contact inhibition of locomotion and whether it also occurs in vivo are still unknown. Here we show that neural crest cells, a highly migratory and multipotent embryonic cell population, whose behaviour has been likened to malignant invasion, demonstrate contact inhibition of locomotion both in vivo and in vitro, and that this accounts for their directional migration. When two migrating neural crest cells meet, they stop, collapse their protrusions and change direction. In contrast, when a neural crest cell meets another cell type, it fails to display contact inhibition of locomotion; instead, it invades the other tissue, in the same manner as metastatic cancer cells. We show that inhibition of non-canonical Wnt signalling abolishes both contact inhibition of locomotion and the directionality of neural crest migration. Wnt-signalling members localize at the site of cell contact, leading to activation of RhoA in this region. These results provide the first example of contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo, provide an explanation for coherent directional migration of groups of cells and establish a previously unknown role for non-canonical Wnt signalling.

Citing Articles

Polarity and migration of cranial and cardiac neural crest cells: underlying molecular mechanisms and disease implications.

Salinas E, Ruano-Rivadeneira F, Leal J, Caprile T, Torrejon M, Arriagada C Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 12():1457506.

PMID: 39834387 PMC: 11743681. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1457506.


Model supports asymmetric regulation across the intercellular junction for collective cell polarization.

Levandosky K, Copos C PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(12):e1012216.

PMID: 39689113 PMC: 11687927. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012216.


Variations in non-local interaction range lead to emergent chase-and-run in heterogeneous populations.

Painter K, Giunta V, Potts J, Bernardi S J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(219):20240409.

PMID: 39474790 PMC: 11522976. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0409.


Regulation of epithelial cell jamming transition by cytoskeleton and cell-cell interactions.

Latham Z, Bermudez A, Hu J, Lin N Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 5(4):041301.

PMID: 39416285 PMC: 11479637. DOI: 10.1063/5.0220088.


Galvanotactic directionality of cell groups depends on group size.

Copos C, Sun Y, Zhu K, Zhang Y, Reid B, Draper B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39185145 PMC: 11343102. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.13.607794.


References
1.
HEAYSMAN J . Non-reciprocal contact inhibition. Experientia. 1970; 26(12):1344-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02113020. View

2.
ABERCROMBIE M, HEAYSMAN J . Invasiveness of sarcoma cells. Nature. 1954; 174(4432):697-8. DOI: 10.1038/174697a0. View

3.
Hendrix M, Seftor E, Seftor R, Kasemeier-Kulesa J, Kulesa P, Postovit L . Reprogramming metastatic tumour cells with embryonic microenvironments. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007; 7(4):246-55. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2108. View

4.
ABERCROMBIE M, HEAYSMAN J . Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp Cell Res. 1953; 5(1):111-31. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(53)90098-6. View

5.
Ayala R, Shu T, Tsai L . Trekking across the brain: the journey of neuronal migration. Cell. 2007; 128(1):29-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.021. View