» Articles » PMID: 19002945

Towards Predictive Models of Stem Cell Fate

Overview
Journal Cytotechnology
Specialties Biotechnology
Genetics
Date 2008 Nov 13
PMID 19002945
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quantitative approaches are essential for the advancement of strategies to manipulate stem cells or their derivatives for therapeutic applications. Predictive models of stem cell systems would provide the means to pose and validate non-intuitive hypotheses and could thus serve as an important tool for discerning underlying regulatory mechanisms governing stem cell fate decisions. In this paper we review the development of computational models that attempt to describe mammalian adult and embryonic stem (ES) cell responses. Early stochastic models that relied exclusively on statistical distributions to describe the in vitro or in vivo output of stem cells are being revised to incorporate the contributions of exogenous and endogenous parameters on specific stem cell fate processes. Recent models utilize cell specific data (for example, cell-surface receptor distributions, transcription factor half-lives, cell-cycle status, etc.) to provide mechanistic descriptions that are consistent with biologically observed phenomena. Ultimately, the goal of these computational models is to, a priori, predict stem cell output given an initial set of conditions. Our efforts to develop a predictive model of ES cell fate are discussed. The quantitative studies presented in this review represent an important step in developing bioengineering approaches to characterize and predict stem cell behavior. Ongoing efforts to incorporate genetic and signaling network data into computational models should accelerate our understanding of fundamental principles governing stem cell fate decisions.

Citing Articles

Stem cell-based approaches for developmental neurotoxicity testing.

Ku J, Asuri P Front Toxicol. 2024; 6:1402630.

PMID: 39238878 PMC: 11374538. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1402630.


The recent advances in the mathematical modelling of human pluripotent stem cells.

Wadkin L, Orozco-Fuentes S, Neganova I, Lako M, Shukurov A, Parker N SN Appl Sci. 2020; 2(2):276.

PMID: 32803125 PMC: 7391994. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-2070-3.


Quantifying intrinsic and extrinsic control of single-cell fates in cancer and stem/progenitor cell pedigrees with competing risks analysis.

Cornwell J, Hallett R, der Mauer S, Motazedian A, Schroeder T, Draper J Sci Rep. 2016; 6:27100.

PMID: 27250534 PMC: 4890426. DOI: 10.1038/srep27100.


Influence of the microenvironment on cell fate determination and migration.

Bloom A, Zaman M Physiol Genomics. 2014; 46(9):309-14.

PMID: 24619520 PMC: 4035623. DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00170.2013.


Investigating biocomplexity through the agent-based paradigm.

Kaul H, Ventikos Y Brief Bioinform. 2013; 16(1):137-52.

PMID: 24227161 PMC: 4293376. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbt077.


References
1.
Agur Z, Daniel Y, Ginosar Y . The universal properties of stem cells as pinpointed by a simple discrete model. J Math Biol. 2002; 44(1):79-86. DOI: 10.1007/s002850100115. View

2.
Loeffler M, Birke A, Winton D, Potten C . Somatic mutation, monoclonality and stochastic models of stem cell organization in the intestinal crypt. J Theor Biol. 1993; 160(4):471-91. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1031. View

3.
Zandstra P, Conneally E, Petzer A, Piret J, Eaves C . Cytokine manipulation of primitive human hematopoietic cell self-renewal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(9):4698-703. PMC: 20787. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4698. View

4.
Qian X, Shen Q, Goderie S, He W, Capela A, Davis A . Timing of CNS cell generation: a programmed sequence of neuron and glial cell production from isolated murine cortical stem cells. Neuron. 2000; 28(1):69-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00086-6. View

5.
Shah N, Marchionni M, ISAACS I, Stroobant P, Anderson D . Glial growth factor restricts mammalian neural crest stem cells to a glial fate. Cell. 1994; 77(3):349-60. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90150-3. View