» Articles » PMID: 17625253

Asymmetry of Stem Cell Fate and the Potential Impact of the Niche: Observations, Simulations, and Interpretations

Overview
Journal Stem Cell Rev
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2007 Jul 13
PMID 17625253
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Asymmetric cell division is a common concept to explain the capability of stem cells to simultaneously produce a continuous output of differentiated cells and to maintain their own population of undifferentiated cells. Whereas for some stem cell systems, an asymmetry in the division process has explicitly been demonstrated, no evidence for such a functional asymmetry has been shown for hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) so far. This raises the question regarding whether asymmetry of cell division is a prerequisite to explain obvious heterogeneity in the cellular fate of HSC. Through the application of a mathematical model based on self-organizing principles, we demonstrate that the assumption of asymmetric stem cell division is not necessary to provide a consistent account for experimentally observed asymmetries in the development of HSC. Our simulation results show that asymmetric cell fate can alternatively be explained by a reversible expression of functional stem cell potentials, controlled by changing cell-cell and cell-microenvironment interactions. The proposed view on stem cell organization is pointing to the potential role of stem cell niches as specific signaling environments, which induce developmental asymmetries and therefore, generate cell fate heterogeneity. The self-organizing concept is fully consistent with the functional definition of tissue stem cells. It naturally includes plasticity phenomena without contradicting a hierarchical appearance of the stem cell population. The concept implies that stem cell fate is only predictable in a probabilistic sense and that retrospective categorization of stem cell potential, based on individual cellular fates, provides an incomplete picture.

Citing Articles

Dynamically adjusted cell fate decisions and resilience to mutant invasion during steady-state hematopoiesis revealed by an experimentally parameterized mathematical model.

Komarova N, Rignot C, Fleischman A, Wodarz D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(38):e2321525121.

PMID: 39250660 PMC: 11420203. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2321525121.


Awakening the HSC: Dynamic Modeling of HSC Maintenance Unravels Regulation of the TP53 Pathway and Quiescence.

Ikonomi N, Kuhlwein S, Schwab J, Kestler H Front Physiol. 2020; 11:848.

PMID: 32848827 PMC: 7411231. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00848.


Nov/CCN3 Enhances Cord Blood Engraftment by Rapidly Recruiting Latent Human Stem Cell Activity.

Gupta R, Turati V, Brian D, Thrussel C, Wilbourn B, May G Cell Stem Cell. 2020; 26(4):527-541.e8.

PMID: 32197066 PMC: 7118368. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.02.012.


Optimizing adipogenic transdifferentiation of bovine mesenchymal stem cells: a prominent role of ascorbic acid in induction.

Jurek S, Sandhu M, Trappe S, Bermudez-Pena M, Kolisek M, Sponder G Adipocyte. 2020; 9(1):35-50.

PMID: 31996081 PMC: 6999845. DOI: 10.1080/21623945.2020.1720480.


Automated Segmentation of Fluorescence Microscopy Images for 3D Cell Detection in human-derived Cardiospheres.

Salvi M, Morbiducci U, Amadeo F, Santoro R, Angelini F, Chimenti I Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):6644.

PMID: 31040327 PMC: 6491482. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43137-2.


References
1.
Takano H, Ema H, Sudo K, Nakauchi H . Asymmetric division and lineage commitment at the level of hematopoietic stem cells: inference from differentiation in daughter cell and granddaughter cell pairs. J Exp Med. 2004; 199(3):295-302. PMC: 2211802. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20030929. View

2.
Loeffler M, Roeder I . Tissue stem cells: definition, plasticity, heterogeneity, self-organization and models--a conceptual approach. Cells Tissues Organs. 2002; 171(1):8-26. DOI: 10.1159/000057688. View

3.
Kaltschmidt J, Brand A . Asymmetric cell division: microtubule dynamics and spindle asymmetry. J Cell Sci. 2002; 115(Pt 11):2257-64. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.115.11.2257. View

4.
Jan Y, Jan L . Asymmetric cell division in the Drosophila nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(11):772-9. DOI: 10.1038/35097516. View

5.
Kay H . HOW MANY CELL-GENERATIONS?. Lancet. 1965; 2(7409):418-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)90763-4. View