» Articles » PMID: 18930918

Mapping in Vivo Chromatin Interactions in Yeast Suggests an Extended Chromatin Fiber with Regional Variation in Compaction

Overview
Journal J Biol Chem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2008 Oct 22
PMID 18930918
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The higher order arrangement of nucleosomes and the level of compaction of the chromatin fiber play important roles in the control of gene expression and other genomic activities. Analysis of chromatin in vitro has suggested that under near physiological conditions chromatin fibers can become highly compact and that the level of compaction can be modulated by histone modifications. However, less is known about the organization of chromatin fibers in living cells. Here, we combine chromosome conformation capture (3C) data with distance measurements and polymer modeling to determine the in vivo mass density of a transcriptionally active 95-kb GC-rich domain on chromosome III of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In contrast to previous reports, we find that yeast does not form a compact fiber but that chromatin is extended with a mass per unit length that is consistent with a rather loose arrangement of nucleosomes. Analysis of 3C data from a neighboring AT-rich chromosomal domain indicates that chromatin in this domain is more compact, but that mass density is still well below that of a canonical 30 nm fiber. Our approach should be widely applicable to scale 3C data to real spatial dimensions, which will facilitate the quantification of the effects of chromatin modifications and transcription on chromatin fiber organization.

Citing Articles

The chromosome folding problem and how cells solve it.

Dekker J, Mirny L Cell. 2024; 187(23):6424-6450.

PMID: 39547207 PMC: 11569382. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.026.


ATP-dependent remodeling of chromatin condensates uncovers distinct mesoscale effects of two remodelers.

Moore C, Wong E, Kaur U, Chio U, Zhou Z, Ostrowski M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39314305 PMC: 11418981. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.10.611504.


Algorithmic considerations when analysing capture Hi-C data.

Disney-Hogg L, Kinnersley B, Houlston R Wellcome Open Res. 2022; 5:289.

PMID: 36474805 PMC: 9699993. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16394.2.


CTCF-CTCF loops and intra-TAD interactions show differential dependence on cohesin ring integrity.

Liu Y, Dekker J Nat Cell Biol. 2022; 24(10):1516-1527.

PMID: 36202971 PMC: 10174090. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-022-00992-y.


Modeling cell biological features of meiotic chromosome pairing to study interlock resolution.

J Navarro E, Marshall W, Fung J PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(6):e1010252.

PMID: 35696428 PMC: 9232156. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010252.


References
1.
Splinter E, Grosveld F, de Laat W . 3C technology: analyzing the spatial organization of genomic loci in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 2004; 375:493-507. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(03)75030-7. View

2.
Woodcock C, Horowitz R . Chromatin organization re-viewed. Trends Cell Biol. 1995; 5(7):272-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89038-8. View

3.
Routh A, Sandin S, Rhodes D . Nucleosome repeat length and linker histone stoichiometry determine chromatin fiber structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(26):8872-7. PMC: 2440727. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802336105. View

4.
Dekker J . A closer look at long-range chromosomal interactions. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003; 28(6):277-80. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00089-6. View

5.
Yokota H, Singer M, van den Engh G, Trask B . Regional differences in the compaction of chromatin in human G0/G1 interphase nuclei. Chromosome Res. 1997; 5(3):157-66. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018438729203. View