» Articles » PMID: 18703655

Implementation of Computerised Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) in the NHS: Quantitative Before and After Study

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2008 Aug 16
PMID 18703655
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of components of the national programme for information technology (NPfIT) on measures of clinical and operational efficiency.

Design: Quasi-experimental controlled before and after study using routinely collected patient level data.

Setting: Four NHS acute hospital trusts in England.

Data Sources: Inpatient admissions and outpatient appointments, 2000-5.

Interventions: A system for ordering pathology tests and browsing results (computerised physician order entry, CPOE) and a system for requesting radiological examinations and displaying images (picture archiving and communications system, PACS).

Main Outcome Measures: Requests per inpatient, outpatient, or day case patient for full blood count, urine culture and urea and electrolytes tests, and plain x ray film, computed tomography, and ultrasonography examinations.

Results: CPOE was associated with a reduction in the proportion of outpatient appointments at which full blood count (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.40), urea and electrolytes (0.55, 0.39 to 0.77), and urine culture (0.30, 0.17 to 0.51) tests were ordered, and at which full blood count tests were repeated (0.73, 0.53 to 0.99). Conversely, the same system was associated with an almost fourfold increase in the use of urea and electrolytes tests among day case patients (3.63, 1.66 to 7.94). PACS was associated with a reduction in repeat plain x ray films at outpatient appointments (0.62, 0.44 to 0.88) and a reduction in inpatient computed tomography (0.83, 0.70 to 0.98). Conversely, it was associated with increases in computed tomography requested at outpatient appointments (1.89, 1.26 to 2.84) and computed tomography repeated within 48 hours during an inpatient stay (2.18, 1.52 to 3.14).

Conclusions: CPOE and PACS were associated with both increases and reductions in tests and examinations. The magnitude of the changes is potentially important with respect to the efficiency of provision of health care. Better information about the impact of modern IT is required to enable healthcare organisations to manage implementation optimally.

Citing Articles

Effect of electronic records on mortality among patients in hospital and primary healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Bogale T, Derseh L, Abraham L, Willems H, Metzger J, Abere B Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1377826.

PMID: 38988733 PMC: 11233798. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1377826.


Adoption by clinicians of electronic order communications in NHS secondary care: a descriptive account.

Coleman J, Atia J, Evison F, Wilson L, Gallier S, Sames R BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024; 31(1).

PMID: 38729772 PMC: 11097811. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100850.


Does an electronic pathology ordering system change the volume and pattern of routine testing in hospital? An interrupted time series analysis.

de Carle M, Macnab B, Utainrat J, Herkes-Deane J, Attia J, de Malmanche T J Clin Pathol. 2023; 77(8):528-535.

PMID: 37085324 PMC: 11287530. DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2023-208850.


Impact of an Intensive Care Information System on the Length of Stay of Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients: Observational Study.

Havel C, Selim J, Besnier E, Gouin P, Veber B, Clavier T JMIR Perioper Med. 2021; 2(2):e14501.

PMID: 33393935 PMC: 7709852. DOI: 10.2196/14501.


Investigating the satisfaction level of physicians in regards to implementing medical Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS).

Abbasi R, Sadeqi Jabali M, Khajouei R, Tadayon H BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1):180.

PMID: 32758220 PMC: 7405331. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01203-0.


References
1.
Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg M . Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11(3):207-16. PMC: 400519. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1372. View

2.
Tierney W, McDonald C, Martin D, ROGERS M . Computerized display of past test results. Effect on outpatient testing. Ann Intern Med. 1987; 107(4):569-74. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-569. View

3.
Keen J, Bryan S, Muris N, Weatherburn G, Buxton M . Evaluation of diffuse technologies: the case of digital imaging networks. Health Policy. 1995; 34(3):153-66. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00767-9. View

4.
Hendy J, Fulop N, Reeves B, Hutchings A, Collin S . Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts. BMJ. 2007; 334(7608):1360. PMC: 1906623. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39195.598461.551. View

5.
Georgiou A, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J, Iedema R, Ray S, Forsyth R . When requests become orders--a formative investigation into the impact of a computerized physician order entry system on a pathology laboratory service. Int J Med Inform. 2006; 76(8):583-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.04.002. View