» Articles » PMID: 24381708

Computerized Physician Order Entry: Promise, Perils, and Experience

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2014 Jan 2
PMID 24381708
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) has been promoted as an important component of patient safety, quality improvement, and modernization of medical practice. In practice, however, CPOE affects health care delivery in complex ways, with benefits as well as risks. Every implementation of CPOE is associated with both generally recognized and unique local factors that can facilitate or confound its rollout, and neurohospitalists will often be at the forefront of such rollouts. In this article, we review the literature on CPOE, beginning with definitions and proceeding to comparisons to the standard of care. We then proceed to discuss clinical decision support systems, negative aspects of CPOE, and cultural context of CPOE implementation. Before concluding, we follow the experiences of a Chief Medical Information Officer and neurohospitalist who rolled out a CPOE system at his own health care organization and managed the resulting workflow changes and setbacks.

Citing Articles

Red blood cell transfusion clinical decision support: A scoping review of guideline adherence and clinical impact.

Czako S, Prochaska M Transfusion. 2025; 65(2):410-419.

PMID: 39828901 PMC: 11842101. DOI: 10.1111/trf.18122.


Implementation of Computerized Prescriber Order Entry Systems: A Review of Impacts, Barriers, and Facilitators.

Farrugia I, Vella Bonanno P J Pharm Technol. 2024; 40(6):277-286.

PMID: 39507878 PMC: 11536519. DOI: 10.1177/87551225241284919.


Artificial intelligence in the pre-analytical phase: State-of-the art and future perspectives.

Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Favaloro E J Med Biochem. 2024; 43(1):1-10.

PMID: 38496022 PMC: 10943465. DOI: 10.5937/jomb0-45936.


Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Tadavarthi Y, Makeeva V, Wagstaff W, Zhan H, Podlasek A, Bhatia N Radiol Artif Intell. 2022; 4(2):e210114.

PMID: 35391770 PMC: 8980942. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210114.


Policy parameters for optimising hospital ePrescribing: An exploratory literature review of selected countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Perera U, Heeney C, Sheikh A Digit Health. 2022; 8:20552076221085074.

PMID: 35340903 PMC: 8941697. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221085074.


References
1.
Beuscart-Zephir M, Pelayo S, Degoulet P, Anceaux F, Guerlinger S, Meaux J . A usability study of CPOE's medication administration functions: impact on physician-nurse cooperation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 2):1018-22. View

2.
Vaidya V, Sowan A, Mills M, Soeken K, Gaffoor M, Hilmas E . Evaluating the safety and efficiency of a CPOE system for continuous medication infusions in a pediatric ICU. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007; :1128. PMC: 1839548. View

3.
Lin C, Payne T, Paul Nichol W, Hoey P, Anderson C, Gennari J . Evaluating clinical decision support systems: monitoring CPOE order check override rates in the Department of Veterans Affairs' Computerized Patient Record System. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15(5):620-6. PMC: 2528033. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2453. View

4.
Graumlich J, Novotny N, Nace G, Aldag J . Patient and physician perceptions after software-assisted hospital discharge: cluster randomized trial. J Hosp Med. 2009; 4(6):356-63. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.565. View

5.
Roberts G, Farmer C, Cheney P, Govis S, Belcher T, Walsh S . Clinical decision support implemented with academic detailing improves prescribing of key renally cleared drugs in the hospital setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010; 17(3):308-12. PMC: 2995705. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.001537. View