Computerised Pathology Test Order Entry Reduces Laboratory Turnaround Times and Influences Tests Ordered by Hospital Clinicians: a Controlled Before and After Study

Overview

Journal J Clin Pathol

Specialty Pathology

Date 2006 Feb 8

PMID 16461564

Citations 22

Authors

J I Westbrook

A Georgiou

A Dimos

T Germanos

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of a computerised pathology order entry system on laboratory turnaround times and test ordering within a teaching hospital.

Methods: A controlled before and after study compared test assays ordered from 11 wards two months before (n = 97 851) and after (n = 113 762) the implementation of a computerised pathology order entry system (Cerner Millennium Powerchart). Comparisons were made of laboratory turnaround times, frequency of tests ordered and specimens taken, proportions of patients having tests, average number per patient, and percentage of gentamicin and vancomycin specimens labelled as random.

Results: Intervention wards experienced an average decrease in turnaround of 15.5 minutes/test assay (range 73.8 to 58.3 minutes; p<0.001). Reductions were significant for prioritised and non-prioritised tests, and for those done within and outside business hours. There was no significant change in the average number of tests (p = 0.228), or specimens per patient (p = 0.324), and no change in turnaround time for the control ward (p = 0.218). Use of structured order screens enhanced data provided to laboratories. Removing three test assays from the liver function order set resulted in significantly fewer of these tests being done.

Conclusions: Computerised order entry systems are an important element in achieving faster test results. These systems can influence test ordering patterns through structured order screens, manipulation of order sets, and analysis of real time data to assess the impact of such changes, not possible with paper based systems. The extent to which improvements translate into improved patient outcomes remains to be determined. A potentially limiting factor is clinicians' capacity to respond to, and make use of, faster test results.

Citing Articles

Assessing the cost and utilization of SMS printers by primary health care facilities: lessons learned from South Africa.

Cassim N, Olsen F, Stewart-Isherwood L, da Silva M, Stevens W J Public Health Afr. 2023; 14(4):2253.

PMID: 37347071 PMC: 10280246. DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2023.2253.

Does an electronic pathology ordering system change the volume and pattern of routine testing in hospital? An interrupted time series analysis.

de Carle M, Macnab B, Utainrat J, Herkes-Deane J, Attia J, de Malmanche T J Clin Pathol. 2023; 77(8):528-535.

PMID: 37085324 PMC: 11287530. DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2023-208850.

Cost of running a full-service receiving office at a centralised testing laboratory in South Africa.

Cassim N, Ramdin N, Moodly S, Glencross D Afr J Lab Med. 2022; 11(1):1504.

PMID: 35937761 PMC: 9350462. DOI: 10.4102/ajlm.v11i1.1504.

The forgetting health system.

Coiera E Learn Health Syst. 2019; 1(4):e10023.

PMID: 31245565 PMC: 6508563. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10023.

Ordering Patterns and Costs of Specialized Laboratory Testing by Hospitalists and House Staff in Hospitalized Patients With HIV at a County Hospital: An Opportunity for Diagnostic Stewardship.

Bolles K, Woc-Colburn L, Hamill R, Hemmige V Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019; 6(6):ofz158.

PMID: 31205970 PMC: 6557192. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz158.

References

Zaat J, van Eijk J, Bonte H . Laboratory test form design influences test ordering by general practitioners in The Netherlands. Med Care. 1992; 30(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199203000-00001. View

Fraser C, Woodford F . Strategies to modify the test-requesting patterns of clinicians. Ann Clin Biochem. 1987; 24 ( Pt 3):223-31. DOI: 10.1177/000456328702400301. View

Rind D, Safran C, Phillips R, Wang Q, Calkins D, Delbanco T . Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154(13):1511-7. View

Overhage J, Tierney W, Zhou X, McDonald C . A randomized trial of "corollary orders" to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997; 4(5):364-75. PMC: 61254. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040364. View

Ostbye T, Moen A, Erikssen G, Hurlen P . Introducing a module for laboratory test order entry and reporting of results at a hospital ward: an evaluation study using a multi-method approach. J Med Syst. 1997; 21(2):107-17. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022894324357. View

Solomon D, Hashimoto H, Daltroy L, Liang M . Techniques to improve physicians' use of diagnostic tests: a new conceptual framework. JAMA. 1998; 280(23):2020-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.23.2020. View

Van Walraven C, Goel V, Chan B . Effect of population-based interventions on laboratory utilization: a time-series analysis. JAMA. 1998; 280(23):2028-33. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.23.2028. View

Poon E, Gandhi T, Sequist T, Murff H, Karson A, Bates D . "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(20):2223-8. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.20.2223. View

Garg A, Adhikari N, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano M, Devereaux P, Beyene J . Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1223-38. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223. View

10.

Kilpatrick E, Holding S . Use of computer terminals on wards to access emergency test results: a retrospective audit. BMJ. 2001; 322(7294):1101-3. PMC: 31264. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1101. View

11.

Overhage J, Perkins S, Tierney W, McDonald C . Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians' time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001; 8(4):361-71. PMC: 130081. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080361. View

12.

Shu K, Boyle D, SPURR C, Horsky J, HEIMAN H, OConnor P . Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001; 84(Pt 2):1207-11. View

13.

Winkens R, Dinant G . Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practice. BMJ. 2002; 324(7340):783. PMC: 1122712. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7340.783. View

14.

Mekhjian H, Kumar R, Kuehn L, Bentley T, Teater P, Thomas A . Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002; 9(5):529-39. PMC: 346640. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1038. View

15.

Gopal Rao G, Crook M, Tillyer M . Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last?. J Clin Pathol. 2003; 56(4):243-8. PMC: 1769923. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.56.4.243. View

16.

Jamtvedt G, Young J, Kristoffersen D, Thomson OBrien M, Oxman A . Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (3):CD000259. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259. View

17.

Ash J, Gorman P, Lavelle M, Stavri P, Lyman J, Fournier L . Perceptions of physician order entry: results of a cross-site qualitative study. Methods Inf Med. 2003; 42(4):313-23. View

18.

Berger R, Kichak J . Computerized physician order entry: helpful or harmful?. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003; 11(2):100-3. PMC: 353014. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1411. View

19.

Humber M . National programme for information technology. BMJ. 2004; 328(7449):1145-6. PMC: 411076. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1145. View

20.

Coiera E . Four rules for the reinvention of health care. BMJ. 2004; 328(7449):1197-9. PMC: 411109. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1197. View