» Articles » PMID: 17444312

The Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Prone Patients: a Retrospective Audit of 245 Patients

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2007 Apr 21
PMID 17444312
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of the classic laryngeal mask airway (classic LMA) in the prone position is controversial, but the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (ProSeal LMA) may be more suitable as it forms a better seal and provides access to the stomach. In the following retrospective audit, we describe our experience with the insertion of and maintenance of anaesthesia with, the ProSeal LMA in 245 healthy adults in the prone position by experienced users. The technique involved (1) the patient adopting the prone position with the head to the side and the table tilted laterally; (2) pre-oxygenation to end-tidal oxygen >90%; (3) induction of anaesthesia with midazolam/alfentanil/propofol; (4) facemask ventilation (5) a single attempt at digital insertion and if unsuccessful a single attempt at laryngoscope-guided, gum elastic bougie-guided insertion; (6) gastric tube insertion; (7) maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane/O/N2O; (8) volume controlled ventilation at 8-12 ml/kg; (9) emergence from anaesthesia in the supine position; and (10) removal ofthe ProSeal LMA when awake. Facemask ventilation was always successful. ProSealLMA insertion was successful in all patients: 237 with digital insertion and eight with bougie-guided insertion. Ventilation was successful in all patients. Gastric tube insertion was successful in all patients. Correctable partial airway obstruction occurred in three patients, but there was no hypoxia, hypercapnoea, displacement, regurgitation, gastric insufflation or airway reflex activation. Our findings suggest that the insertion of and maintenance of anaesthesia with the ProSeal LMA is feasible in the prone position by experienced users.

Citing Articles

Combined segmental spinal epidural for major spine surgery: a case report.

Parthasarathy S, Hussain J BMJ Case Rep. 2024; 17(3).

PMID: 38553019 PMC: 10982760. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-257734.


A Comparison of a Standard Macintosh Blade Laryngoscope, Pentax-AWS Videolaryngoscope and Intubrite Videolaryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Manikins in Sitting and Prone Positions: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.

Gaszynski T Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(8).

PMID: 32824720 PMC: 7459517. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10080603.


Airway management in prone position following penetrating iron rod injury in back: An anaesthetic challenge.

Sharma A, Gupta L, Gupta B Indian J Anaesth. 2019; 63(12):1039-1040.

PMID: 31879431 PMC: 6921321. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_503_19.


Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study.

Oshika H, Koyama Y, Taguri M, Maruyama K, Hirabayashi G, Yamada S Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(25):e11190.

PMID: 29924038 PMC: 6023683. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011190.


Evaluation of performance of Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway™, Laryngeal Mask Airway-ProSeal and endotracheal tube in prone position: A prospective, randomised study.

Hegde H, Bandi J, Mudakanagoudar M, Honnannavar K Indian J Anaesth. 2018; 62(3):173-181.

PMID: 29643550 PMC: 5881318. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_691_17.