» Articles » PMID: 18577596

Force-generation and Dynamic Instability of Microtubule Bundles

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2008 Jun 26
PMID 18577596
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individual dynamic microtubules can generate pushing or pulling forces when their growing or shrinking ends are in contact with cellular objects such as the cortex or chromosomes. These microtubules can operate in parallel bundles, for example when interacting with mitotic chromosomes. Here, we investigate the force-generating capabilities of a bundle of growing microtubules and study the effect that force has on the cooperative dynamics of such a bundle. We used an optical tweezers setup to study microtubule bundles growing against a microfabricated rigid barrier in vitro. We show that multiple microtubules can generate a pushing force that increases linearly with the number of microtubules present. In addition, the bundle can cooperatively switch to a shrinking state, due to a force-induced coupling of the dynamic instability of single microtubules. In the presence of GMPCPP, bundle catastrophes no longer occur, and high bundle forces are reached more effectively. We reproduce the observed behavior with a simple simulation of microtubule bundle dynamics that takes into account previously measured force effects on single microtubules. Using this simulation, we also show that a constant compressive force on a growing bundle leads to oscillations in bundle length that are of potential relevance for chromosome oscillations observed in living cells.

Citing Articles

EB3-informed dynamics of the microtubule stabilizing cap during stalled growth.

Kok M, Huber F, Kalisch S, Dogterom M Biophys J. 2024; 124(2):227-244.

PMID: 39604262 PMC: 11788501. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.3314.


Architecture-driven quantitative nanoscopy maps cytoskeleton remodeling.

Liu W, Yao Y, Meng J, Qian S, Han Y, Zhou L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(42):e2410688121.

PMID: 39374388 PMC: 11494298. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410688121.


Mechanical confinement prevents ectopic platelet release.

Guinard I, Brassard-Jollive N, Ruch L, Weber J, Eckly A, Boscher J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(38):e2407829121.

PMID: 39236232 PMC: 11420179. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2407829121.


Life under tension: the relevance of force on biological polymers.

Halma M, Xu L Biophys Rep. 2024; 10(1):48-56.

PMID: 38737478 PMC: 11079598. DOI: 10.52601/bpr.2023.230019.


A stable microtubule bundle formed through an orchestrated multistep process controls quiescence exit.

Laporte D, Massoni-Laporte A, Lefranc C, Dompierre J, Mauboules D, Nsamba E Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38527106 PMC: 10963028. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89958.


References
1.
Dogterom M, Kerssemakers J, Romet-Lemonne G, Janson M . Force generation by dynamic microtubules. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005; 17(1):67-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.12.011. View

2.
Levesque A, Compton D . The chromokinesin Kid is necessary for chromosome arm orientation and oscillation, but not congression, on mitotic spindles. J Cell Biol. 2001; 154(6):1135-46. PMC: 2150818. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200106093. View

3.
Gardner M, Odde D . Modeling of chromosome motility during mitosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006; 18(6):639-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.10.006. View

4.
Schek 3rd H, Hunt A . Micropatterned structures for studying the mechanics of biological polymers. Biomed Microdevices. 2005; 7(1):41-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10544-005-6170-z. View

5.
Grishchuk E, McIntosh J . Microtubule depolymerization can drive poleward chromosome motion in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2006; 25(20):4888-96. PMC: 1618090. DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601353. View