» Articles » PMID: 18345986

Mid-fusiform Activation During Object Discrimination Reflects the Process of Differentiating Structural Descriptions

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Mar 19
PMID 18345986
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study explored constraints on mid-fusiform activation during object discrimination. In three experiments, participants performed a matching task on simple line configurations, nameable objects, three dimensional (3-D) shapes, and colors. Significant bilateral mid-fusiform activation emerged when participants matched objects and 3-D shapes, as compared to when they matched two-dimensional (2-D) line configurations and colors, indicating that the mid-fusiform is engaged more strongly for processing structural descriptions (e.g., comparing 3-D volumetric shape) than perceptual descriptions (e.g., comparing 2-D or color information). In two of the experiments, the same mid-fusiform regions were also modulated by the degree of structural similarity between stimuli, implicating a role for the mid-fusiform in fine differentiation of similar visual object representations. Importantly, however, this process of fine differentiation occurred at the level of structural, but not perceptual, descriptions. Moreover, mid-fusiform activity was more robust when participants matched shape compared to color information using the identical stimuli, indicating that activity in the mid-fusiform gyrus is not driven by specific stimulus properties, but rather by the process of distinguishing stimuli based on shape information. Taken together, these findings further clarify the nature of object processing in the mid-fusiform gyrus. This region is engaged specifically in structural differentiation, a critical component process of object recognition and categorization.

Citing Articles

Automatic Processing of Numerosity in Human Neocortex Evidenced by Occipital and Parietal Neuromagnetic Responses.

Van Rinsveld A, Wens V, Guillaume M, Beuel A, Gevers W, De Tiege X Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021; 2(2):tgab028.

PMID: 34296173 PMC: 8152830. DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgab028.


Perceptual and category processing of the Uncanny Valley hypothesis' dimension of human likeness: some methodological issues.

Cheetham M, Jancke L J Vis Exp. 2013; (76).

PMID: 23770728 PMC: 3725829. DOI: 10.3791/4375.


Can you catch a liar? How negative emotions affect brain responses when lying or telling the truth.

Proverbio A, Vanutelli M, Adorni R PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e59383.

PMID: 23536874 PMC: 3607607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059383.


Process and domain specificity in regions engaged for face processing: an fMRI study of perceptual differentiation.

Collins H, Zhu X, Bhatt R, Clark J, Joseph J J Cogn Neurosci. 2012; 24(12):2428-44.

PMID: 22849402 PMC: 4527533. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00273.


Contributions of low and high spatial frequency processing to impaired object recognition circuitry in schizophrenia.

Calderone D, Hoptman M, Martinez A, Nair-Collins S, Mauro C, Bar M Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(8):1849-58.

PMID: 22735157 PMC: 3698366. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs169.


References
1.
Gerlach C, Aaside C, Humphreys G, Gade A, Paulson O, Law I . Brain activity related to integrative processes in visual object recognition: bottom-up integration and the modulatory influence of stored knowledge. Neuropsychologia. 2002; 40(8):1254-67. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00222-6. View

2.
OBrien R, Kaiser M . MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. Psychol Bull. 1985; 97(2):316-33. View

3.
Marr D, Nishihara H . Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978; 200(1140):269-94. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1978.0020. View

4.
Engel S, Glover G, Wandell B . Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. Cereb Cortex. 1997; 7(2):181-92. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/7.2.181. View

5.
Joseph J, Gathers A . Natural and manufactured objects activate the fusiform face area. Neuroreport. 2002; 13(7):935-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200205240-00007. View