Viewpoint-invariant and Viewpoint-dependent Object Recognition in Dissociable Neural Subsystems

Overview

Journal Psychon Bull Rev

Specialty Psychology

Date 2000 Nov 18

PMID 11082854

Citations 22

Authors

E D Burgund

C J Marsolek

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Participants viewed objects in the central visual field and then named either same or different depth-orientation views of these objects presented briefly in the left or the right visual field. The different-orientation views contained either the same or a different set of parts and relations. Viewpoint-dependent priming was observed when test views were presented directly to the right hemisphere (RH), but not when test views were presented directly to the left hemisphere (LH). Moreover, this pattern of results did not depend on whether the same or a different set of parts and relations could be recovered from the different-orientation views. Results support the theory that a specific subsystem operates more effectively than an abstract subsystem in the RH and stores objects in a manner that produces viewpoint-dependent effects, whereas an abstract subsystem operates more effectively than a specific subsystem in the LH and does not store objects in a viewpoint-dependent manner.

Citing Articles

Location- and Object-Based Representational Mechanisms Account for Bilateral Field Advantage in Multiple-Object Tracking.

Merkel C, Hopf J, Schoenfeld M eNeuro. 2024; 11(3).

PMID: 38479811 PMC: 10965235. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0519-23.2024.

Features Split and Aggregation Network for Camouflaged Object Detection.

Zhang Z, Wang T, Wang J, Sun Y J Imaging. 2024; 10(1).

PMID: 38249009 PMC: 11154448. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10010024.

Viewpoint dependence and scene context effects generalize to depth rotated three-dimensional objects.

Kallmayer A, Vo M, Draschkow D J Vis. 2023; 23(10):9.

PMID: 37707802 PMC: 10506680. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.10.9.

Visual recognition of mirrored letters and the right hemisphere advantage for mirror-invariant object recognition.

Harrison M, Strother L Psychon Bull Rev. 2018; 25(4):1494-1499.

PMID: 29717412 PMC: 6501580. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1472-3.

Conflicting demands of abstract and specific visual object processing resolved by frontoparietal networks.

McMenamin B, Marsolek C, Morseth B, Speer M, Burton P, Burgund E Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016; 16(3):502-15.

PMID: 26883940 PMC: 4870143. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0409-4.

References

Humphreys G, Riddoch M . Routes to object constancy: implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1984; 36(3):385-415. DOI: 10.1080/14640748408402169. View

Biederman I . Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev. 1987; 94(2):115-147. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115. View

Biederman I, Cooper E . Priming contour-deleted images: evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cogn Psychol. 1991; 23(3):393-419. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90014-f. View

Tanaka K . Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science. 1993; 262(5134):685-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.8235589. View

Marsolek C . Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995; 21(2):375-86. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.2.375. View

Poggio T, Edelman S . A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature. 1990; 343(6255):263-6. DOI: 10.1038/343263a0. View

Edelman S, Bulthoff H . Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Res. 1992; 32(12):2385-400. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90102-o. View

Lawson R, Humphreys G . View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Percept Psychophys. 1998; 60(6):1052-66. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211939. View

Edelman S . Representation is representation of similarities. Behav Brain Sci. 1999; 21(4):449-67; discussion 467-98. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x98001253. View

10.

Logothetis N, Sheinberg D . Visual object recognition. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996; 19:577-621. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.003045. View

11.

Bulthoff H, Edelman S . Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89(1):60-4. PMC: 48175. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.60. View

12.

Gauthier I, Tarr M . Becoming a "Greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Res. 1997; 37(12):1673-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00286-6. View

13.

Srinivas K . Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995; 21(4):1019-36. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.1019. View

14.

Humphrey G, Khan S . Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Can J Psychol. 1992; 46(2):170-90. DOI: 10.1037/h0084320. View

15.

Tarr M, Bulthoff H . Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995; 21(6):1494-505. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.6.1494. View

16.

Cooper L, Schacter D, Ballesteros S, Moore C . Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and reflection. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992; 18(1):43-57. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.1.43. View

17.

Lawson R, Humphreys G . View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996; 22(2):395-416. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.2.395. View

18.

Squire L . Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychol Rev. 1992; 99(2):195-231. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195. View

19.

Tarr M . Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 2(1):55-82. DOI: 10.3758/BF03214412. View

20.

OLDFIELD R . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1):97-113. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. View