» Articles » PMID: 18269982

Analysis of First-derivative Based QRS Detection Algorithms

Overview
Date 2008 Feb 14
PMID 18269982
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate QRS detection is an important first step for the analysis of heart rate variability. Algorithms based on the differentiated ECG are computationally efficient and hence ideal for real-time analysis of large datasets. Here, we analyze traditional first-derivative based squaring function (Hamilton-Tompkins) and Hilbert transform-based methods for QRS detection and their modifications with improved detection thresholds. On a standard ECG dataset, the Hamilton-Tompkins algorithm had the highest detection accuracy (99.68% sensitivity, 99.63% positive predictivity) but also the largest time error. The modified Hamilton-Tompkins algorithm as well as the Hilbert transform-based algorithms had comparable, though slightly lower, accuracy; yet these automated algorithms present an advantage for real-time applications by avoiding human intervention in threshold determination. The high accuracy of the Hilbert transform-based method compared to detection with the second derivative of the ECG is ascribable to its inherently uniform magnitude spectrum. For all algorithms, detection errors occurred mainly in beats with decreased signal slope, such as wide arrhythmic beats or attenuated beats. For best performance, a combination of the squaring function and Hilbert transform-based algorithms can be applied such that differences in detection will point to abnormalities in the signal that can be further analyzed.

Citing Articles

Incorporating Virtual Reality Agents During a Dichotic Speech Reception Task: Insights From the Heart.

Plain B, Pielage H, Zekveld A, Richter M, Bhuiyan T, van de Ven S Ear Hear. 2024; 46(2):444-460.

PMID: 39565283 PMC: 11825489. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001597.


A new QRS detector stress test combining temporal jitter and F-score (JF) reveals significant performance differences amongst popular detectors.

Porr B, Macfarlane P PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0309739.

PMID: 39527567 PMC: 11554035. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309739.


Solving variability: Accurately extracting feature components from ballistocardiograms.

Yang T, Yuan H, Yang J, Zhou Z, Abe M, Nakayama Y Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241277746.

PMID: 39247094 PMC: 11378244. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241277746.


Methodological identification of anomalies episodes in ECG streams: a systematic mapping study.

Iqbal U, Almakki R, Usman M, Altameem A, Albathan M, Jilani A BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):127.

PMID: 38834955 PMC: 11149236. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02251-0.


Robust in-vehicle heartbeat detection using multimodal signal fusion.

Warnecke J, Lasenby J, Deserno T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20864.

PMID: 38012195 PMC: 10682004. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47484-z.


References
1.
Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S . Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation. 1991; 84(2):482-92. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.84.2.482. View

2.
Goldberger A, Amaral L, Glass L, Hausdorff J, Ivanov P, Mark R . PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation. 2000; 101(23):E215-20. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215. View

3.
Ligtenberg A, Kunt M . A robust-digital QRS-detection algorithm for arrhythmia monitoring. Comput Biomed Res. 1983; 16(3):273-86. DOI: 10.1016/0010-4809(83)90027-7. View

4.
Redmond S, Heneghan C . Cardiorespiratory-based sleep staging in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006; 53(3):485-96. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2005.869773. View

5.
Berntson G, Stowell J . ECG artifacts and heart period variability: don't miss a beat!. Psychophysiology. 1998; 35(1):127-32. View