» Articles » PMID: 18254480

Skin Testing and Oral Penicillin Challenge in Patients with a History of Remote Penicillin Allergy

Overview
Date 2008 Feb 8
PMID 18254480
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Penicillin administration is usually contraindicated in penicillin-allergic patients with positive skin test results.

Objective: To examine whether penicillin oral challenge for patients with a history of remote non-life-threatening allergic reaction to penicillin can be well tolerated irrespective of skin test results.

Methods: In a prospective open-label trial, 8,702 individuals were screened between November 1998 and January 2000. Of 687 patients with a non-life-threatening allergic reaction to penicillin, occurring longer than 3 years earlier, 169 were enrolled. Regardless of the response to penicillin skin testing, patients received the usual 1-day dosage of penicillin and amoxicillin, on 2 separate occasions. Two to 6 years later, a follow-up was conducted to assess the outcomes of further penicillin administration.

Results: A total of 272 combined skin tests and oral challenges were performed on 169 patients. Among 137 challenges with a positive skin test result and 135 patients with a negative skin test result, 9 (6.6%) and 5 (3.7%) (P = .29), respectively, developed a mild rash to oral challenge. At follow-up, 2 to 6 years afterward, 3 of 55 patients (5.5%) who were given a full treatment course of penicillin developed a mild skin eruption.

Conclusions: Positive penicillin skin test results for patients with a remote history of non-life-threatening allergic reaction to penicillin were not associated with a greater prevalence of adverse reactions to oral challenge with penicillin than negative results. Because skin testing is considered the gold standard and the safest method for predicting tolerance to penicillin administration, oral penicillin challenge may be used as a diagnostic method only in these specific patients when skin testing is not feasible.

Citing Articles

Narrative review of recent developments and the future of penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergists.

Powell N, Blank M, Luintel A, Elkhalifa S, Bhogal R, Wilcock M NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2025; 2(1):18.

PMID: 39843524 PMC: 11721385. DOI: 10.1038/s44259-024-00035-6.


Challenging dogmas: Intravenous versus oral beta-lactam antibiotic provocation tests.

Molina-Molina G, Gomez-Duque M, Vidal Guitart X, Agusti Escasany A, Labrador-Horrillo M, Luengo O World Allergy Organ J. 2024; 17(6):100914.

PMID: 38855082 PMC: 11153252. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100914.


Intramuscular versus enteral penicillin prophylaxis to prevent progression of rheumatic heart disease: Study protocol for a noninferiority randomized trial (the GOALIE trial).

Rwebembera J, Ndagire E, Carvalho N, Webel A, Sable C, Okello E Am Heart J. 2024; 275:74-85.

PMID: 38797460 PMC: 11330716. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.012.


Analysis of a beta-lactam allergy assessment protocol challenging diverse reported allergies managed by an antimicrobial stewardship program.

Jacobs M, Bremmer D, Shively N, Moffa M, Trienski T, Carr D Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023; 3(1):e153.

PMID: 37771740 PMC: 10523545. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2023.432.


Resensitization in suspected penicillin allergy.

Dona I, Guidolin L, Bogas G, Olivieri E, Labella M, Schiappoli M Allergy. 2022; 78(1):214-224.

PMID: 36067012 PMC: 10087608. DOI: 10.1111/all.15508.