» Articles » PMID: 38855082

Challenging Dogmas: Intravenous Versus Oral Beta-lactam Antibiotic Provocation Tests

Abstract

Background: Drug provocation tests (DPT) are considered the gold standard procedure to ascertain the diagnosis of beta-lactam (BL) allergy. Regarding route of administration, current recommendations prioritize oral challenges, considering them safer, and reserving the intravenous route for drugs for which this is the only formulation.

Objective: To compare in terms of tolerance and safety two protocols of BL DPT, using an oral protocol (OR-DPT) and an intravenous protocol (IV-DPT).

Methods: A descriptive, retrospective study was performed, including adult patients who underwent IV-DPT or OR-DPT for suspected immediate or delayed hypersensitivity to BL antibiotics, over a period of 4 years (between January 2018 and December 2021). Demographical data, index hypersensivity reactions' characteristics and tolerance to DPT were reviewed.

Results: A total of 1036 patients underwent DPT, mean age of 56.8 (standard deviation, SD, 17.8) years, 655 were women (63.2%). Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) had occurred in 564 of patients (54.4%). OR-DPT were performed in 439 (42.4%) and IV-DPT in 597 (57.6%). The frequency of reactions during DPT, regardless of the route used, was low (3.6%): only 16 (3.6%) in OR-DPT and 21 (3.5%) in IV-DPT. From IV-DPT, 16 out 21 DHR during DPT were immediate compared with 4 out of 16 in OR-DPT. Adjusted relative risk of developing a hypersensitivity reaction during IV-DPT versus OR-DPT was 1.13 (95% confidence interval (CI)0.57-2.22).

Conclusion: The results suggest that OR-DPT and IV-DPT are both safe procedures when adequately performed. However, IV-DPT protocols showed a higher rate of immediate DHR during DPT probably due to the selection of basal high-risk patients to undergo IV-DPT. In conclusion, IV-DPT may be considered as an option for challenges in drug-allergy studies, entailing a precise administration.

References
1.
Alvarez-Cuesta E, Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Broyles A, Cuesta-Herranz J, Guzman-Melendez M, Maciag M . Standards for practical intravenous rapid drug desensitization & delabeling: A WAO committee statement. World Allergy Organ J. 2022; 15(6):100640. PMC: 9163606. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100640. View

2.
Audicana M, Ortega N, Lobera T, Blanca-Lopez N, De la Parte B, Garcia I . Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC) Vision of Drug Provocation Tests. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2021; 31(5):385-403. DOI: 10.18176/jiaci.0681. View

3.
Shaker M, Khan D, Banerji A, Blumenthal K, Phillips E, Solensky R . Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022; 150(6):1333-1393. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028. View

4.
Chiriac A, Rerkpattanapipat T, Bousquet P, Molinari N, Demoly P . Optimal step doses for drug provocation tests to prove beta-lactam hypersensitivity. Allergy. 2016; 72(4):552-561. DOI: 10.1111/all.13037. View

5.
Sheikh A, Shehata Y, Brown S, Simons F . Adrenaline for the treatment of anaphylaxis: cochrane systematic review. Allergy. 2009; 64(2):204-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01926.x. View