» Articles » PMID: 17997597

Genetic Progression and the Waiting Time to Cancer

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Nov 14
PMID 17997597
Citations 190
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer results from genetic alterations that disturb the normal cooperative behavior of cells. Recent high-throughput genomic studies of cancer cells have shown that the mutational landscape of cancer is complex and that individual cancers may evolve through mutations in as many as 20 different cancer-associated genes. We use data published by Sjöblom et al. (2006) to develop a new mathematical model for the somatic evolution of colorectal cancers. We employ the Wright-Fisher process for exploring the basic parameters of this evolutionary process and derive an analytical approximation for the expected waiting time to the cancer phenotype. Our results highlight the relative importance of selection over both the size of the cell population at risk and the mutation rate. The model predicts that the observed genetic diversity of cancer genomes can arise under a normal mutation rate if the average selective advantage per mutation is on the order of 1%. Increased mutation rates due to genetic instability would allow even smaller selective advantages during tumorigenesis. The complexity of cancer progression can be understood as the result of multiple sequential mutations, each of which has a relatively small but positive effect on net cell growth.

Citing Articles

DICE: fast and accurate distance-based reconstruction of single-cell copy number phylogenies.

Weiner S, Bansal M Life Sci Alliance. 2024; 8(3).

PMID: 39667913 PMC: 11638338. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202402923.


North India Cancer Risk: A Detailed Review with Focus on Jammu and Kashmir Demographics.

Sudershan A, Bharti S, Sudershan S, Bhagat M, Bhagat S, Behlam I Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(10):3489-3506.

PMID: 39471015 PMC: 11711370. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.10.3489.


A modelling framework for cancer ecology and evolution.

Adler F J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(216):20240099.

PMID: 39013418 PMC: 11251767. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0099.


Long-term Multimodal Recording Reveals Epigenetic Adaptation Routes in Dormant Breast Cancer Cells.

Rosano D, Sofyali E, Dhiman H, Ghirardi C, Ivanoiu D, Heide T Cancer Discov. 2024; 14(5):866-889.

PMID: 38527495 PMC: 11061610. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-1161.


From molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer to translational applications: based on multi-omics fusion analysis and intelligent medicine.

Ren S, Li J, Dorado J, Sierra A, Gonzalez-Diaz H, Duardo A Health Inf Sci Syst. 2023; 12(1):6.

PMID: 38125666 PMC: 10728428. DOI: 10.1007/s13755-023-00264-5.


References
1.
Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R, Dalgliesh G, Hunter C, Bignell G . Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature. 2007; 446(7132):153-8. PMC: 2712719. DOI: 10.1038/nature05610. View

2.
Brink M, Weijenberg M, de Goeij A, Schouten L, Koedijk F, Roemen G . Fat and K-ras mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer in The Netherlands Cohort Study. Carcinogenesis. 2004; 25(9):1619-28. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgh177. View

3.
Michor F, Iwasa Y, Lengauer C, Nowak M . Dynamics of colorectal cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005; 15(6):484-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.06.005. View

4.
Desai M, Fisher D . Beneficial mutation selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection. Genetics. 2007; 176(3):1759-98. PMC: 1931526. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.067678. View

5.
Rambhatla L, Ram-Mohan S, Cheng J, Sherley J . Immortal DNA strand cosegregation requires p53/IMPDH-dependent asymmetric self-renewal associated with adult stem cells. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(8):3155-61. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3161. View