» Articles » PMID: 17483432

Beneficial Mutation Selection Balance and the Effect of Linkage on Positive Selection

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2007 May 8
PMID 17483432
Citations 253
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When beneficial mutations are rare, they accumulate by a series of selective sweeps. But when they are common, many beneficial mutations will occur before any can fix, so there will be many different mutant lineages in the population concurrently. In an asexual population, these different mutant lineages interfere and not all can fix simultaneously. In addition, further beneficial mutations can accumulate in mutant lineages while these are still a minority of the population. In this article, we analyze the dynamics of such multiple mutations and the interplay between multiple mutations and interference between clones. These result in substantial variation in fitness accumulating within a single asexual population. The amount of variation is determined by a balance between selection, which destroys variation, and beneficial mutations, which create more. The behavior depends in a subtle way on the population parameters: the population size, the beneficial mutation rate, and the distribution of the fitness increments of the potential beneficial mutations. The mutation-selection balance leads to a continually evolving population with a steady-state fitness variation. This variation increases logarithmically with both population size and mutation rate and sets the rate at which the population accumulates beneficial mutations, which thus also grows only logarithmically with population size and mutation rate. These results imply that mutator phenotypes are less effective in larger asexual populations. They also have consequences for the advantages (or disadvantages) of sex via the Fisher-Muller effect; these are discussed briefly.

Citing Articles

Clonal interference, genetic variation and the speed of evolution in structured populations.

Kuo Y, Hu J, Carja O bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027632 PMC: 11870626. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.22.639636.


History shapes regulatory and evolutionary responses to tigecycline in strains of from the pre- and post-antibiotic eras.

Rokes A, Santos-Lopez A, Cooper V bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39896641 PMC: 11785199. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.22.634413.


Neutral drift upon threshold-like selection promotes variation in antibiotic resistance phenotype.

Erdogan A, Dasmeh P, Socha R, Chen J, Life B, Jun R Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10813.

PMID: 39737968 PMC: 11685847. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55012-4.


Eco-evolutionary dynamics of adapting pathogens and host immunity.

Barrat-Charlaix P, Neher R Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39728926 PMC: 11677248. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97350.


Optimisation strategies for directed evolution without sequencing.

James J, Towers S, Foerster J, Steel H PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(12):e1012695.

PMID: 39700257 PMC: 11698521. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012695.


References
1.
Kim Y, Stephan W . Selective sweeps in the presence of interference among partially linked loci. Genetics. 2003; 164(1):389-98. PMC: 1462541. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/164.1.389. View

2.
Otto S, Barton N . The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 1997; 147(2):879-906. PMC: 1208206. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.879. View

3.
Gerrish P . The rhythm of microbial adaptation. Nature. 2001; 413(6853):299-302. DOI: 10.1038/35095046. View

4.
Miralles R, Moya A, Elena S . Diminishing returns of population size in the rate of RNA virus adaptation. J Virol. 2000; 74(8):3566-71. PMC: 111865. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.74.8.3566-3571.2000. View

5.
Felsenstein J . The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974; 78(2):737-56. PMC: 1213231. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. View