» Articles » PMID: 17970819

An Application of a Mixed-effects Location Scale Model for Analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Data

Overview
Journal Biometrics
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 Nov 1
PMID 17970819
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For longitudinal data, mixed models include random subject effects to indicate how subjects influence their responses over repeated assessments. The error variance and the variance of the random effects are usually considered to be homogeneous. These variance terms characterize the within-subjects (i.e., error variance) and between-subjects (i.e., random-effects variance) variation in the data. In studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), up to 30 or 40 observations are often obtained for each subject, and interest frequently centers around changes in the variances, both within and between subjects. In this article, we focus on an adolescent smoking study using EMA where interest is on characterizing changes in mood variation. We describe how covariates can influence the mood variances, and also extend the standard mixed model by adding a subject-level random effect to the within-subject variance specification. This permits subjects to have influence on the mean, or location, and variability, or (square of the) scale, of their mood responses. Additionally, we allow the location and scale random effects to be correlated. These mixed-effects location scale models have useful applications in many research areas where interest centers on the joint modeling of the mean and variance structure.

Citing Articles

Wavelet-Mixed Landmark Survival Models for the Effect of Short-Term Changes of Potassium in Heart Failure Patients.

Gregorio C, Barbati G, Scagnetto A, Lenarda A, Ieva F Biom J. 2025; 67(2):e70043.

PMID: 40047178 PMC: 11883744. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.70043.


Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Variance Estimation in Biopharmaceutical Processes.

Schach S, Eilert T, Presser B, Kunzelmann M Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001712 PMC: 11852408. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020193.


Short-term Frailty Index Fluctuations in Older Adults: Noise or Signal?.

Stolz E, Schultz A, Hoogendijk E, Theou O, Rockwood K J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024; 80(1).

PMID: 39501031 PMC: 11632230. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glae262.


Temporal generative models for learning heterogeneous group dynamics of ecological momentary assessment data.

Kim S, Kim Y, Wang Y Biometrics. 2024; 80(4).

PMID: 39400260 PMC: 11472390. DOI: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae115.


Unpacking Habit With Bayesian Mixed Models: Dynamic Approach to Health Behaviors With Interchangeable Elements, Illustrated Through Multiple Sun Protection Behaviors.

Li Y, Schofield E, Hay J Quant Method Psychol. 2024; 19(3):265-280.

PMID: 39323564 PMC: 11423781. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.19.3.p265.


References
1.
Neuhaus J, Kalbfleisch J . Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data. Biometrics. 1998; 54(2):638-45. View

2.
Lin X, Raz J, Harlow S . Linear mixed models with heterogeneous within-cluster variances. Biometrics. 1997; 53(3):910-23. View

3.
Martin M, Hofer S . Intraindividual variability, change, and aging: conceptual and analytical issues. Gerontology. 2003; 50(1):7-11. DOI: 10.1159/000074382. View

4.
Myles J, Price G, Hunter N, Day M, Duffy S . A potentially useful distribution model for dietary intake data. Public Health Nutr. 2003; 6(5):513-9. DOI: 10.1079/PHN2003459. View

5.
Fowler K, Whitlock M . THE DISTRIBUTION OF PHENOTYPIC VARIANCE WITH INBREEDING. Evolution. 2017; 53(4):1143-1156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04528.x. View