» Articles » PMID: 17941704

A Macaque's-eye View of Human Insertions and Deletions: Differences in Mechanisms

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2007 Oct 19
PMID 17941704
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Insertions and deletions (indels) cause numerous genetic diseases and lead to pronounced evolutionary differences among genomes. The macaque sequences provide an opportunity to gain insights into the mechanisms generating these mutations on a genome-wide scale by establishing the polarity of indels occurring in the human lineage since its divergence from the chimpanzee. Here we apply novel regression techniques and multiscale analyses to demonstrate an extensive regional indel rate variation stemming from local fluctuations in divergence, GC content, male and female recombination rates, proximity to telomeres, and other genomic factors. We find that both replication and, surprisingly, recombination are significantly associated with the occurrence of small indels. Intriguingly, the relative inputs of replication versus recombination differ between insertions and deletions, thus the two types of mutations are likely guided in part by distinct mechanisms. Namely, insertions are more strongly associated with factors linked to recombination, while deletions are mostly associated with replication-related features. Indel as a term misleadingly groups the two types of mutations together by their effect on a sequence alignment. However, here we establish that the correct identification of a small gap as an insertion or a deletion (by use of an outgroup) is crucial to determining its mechanism of origin. In addition to providing novel insights into insertion and deletion mutagenesis, these results will assist in gap penalty modeling and eventually lead to more reliable genomic alignments.

Citing Articles

Assessing the impacts of various factors on circular RNA reliability.

Chuang T, Chiang T, Chen C Life Sci Alliance. 2023; 6(5).

PMID: 36849251 PMC: 9971162. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201793.


Study on the Association between Gene InDel and Sheep Body Conformation Traits.

Zhang J, Toremurat Z, Liang Y, Cheng J, Sun Z, Huang Y Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(2).

PMID: 36833283 PMC: 9956668. DOI: 10.3390/genes14020356.


Mutational bias in spermatogonia impacts the anatomy of regulatory sites in the human genome.

Kaiser V, Talmane L, Kumar Y, Semple F, MacLennan M, Fitzpatrick D Genome Res. 2021; 31(11):1994-2007.

PMID: 34417209 PMC: 8559717. DOI: 10.1101/gr.275407.121.


Divergent genome evolution caused by regional variation in DNA gain and loss between human and mouse.

Buckley R, Kortschak R, Adelson D PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(4):e1006091.

PMID: 29677183 PMC: 5931693. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006091.


Using the Neandertal genome to study the evolution of small insertions and deletions in modern humans.

Chintalapati M, Dannemann M, Prufer K BMC Evol Biol. 2017; 17(1):179.

PMID: 28778150 PMC: 5543596. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-1018-8.


References
1.
Britten R . Divergence between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA sequences is 5%, counting indels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(21):13633-5. PMC: 129726. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172510699. View

2.
Morelli M, Cohen P . Not all germ cells are created equal: aspects of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiosis. Reproduction. 2005; 130(6):761-81. DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00865. View

3.
Ross M, Grafham D, Coffey A, Scherer S, McLay K, Muzny D . The DNA sequence of the human X chromosome. Nature. 2005; 434(7031):325-37. PMC: 2665286. DOI: 10.1038/nature03440. View

4.
Higgins D, Blackshields G, Wallace I . Mind the gaps: progress in progressive alignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(30):10411-2. PMC: 1180805. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504801102. View

5.
Gilbert N, Boyle S, Fiegler H, Woodfine K, Carter N, Bickmore W . Chromatin architecture of the human genome: gene-rich domains are enriched in open chromatin fibers. Cell. 2004; 118(5):555-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.011. View