» Articles » PMID: 17934447

High-resolution Structure Prediction and the Crystallographic Phase Problem

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Oct 16
PMID 17934447
Citations 168
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The energy-based refinement of low-resolution protein structure models to atomic-level accuracy is a major challenge for computational structural biology. Here we describe a new approach to refining protein structure models that focuses sampling in regions most likely to contain errors while allowing the whole structure to relax in a physically realistic all-atom force field. In applications to models produced using nuclear magnetic resonance data and to comparative models based on distant structural homologues, the method can significantly improve the accuracy of the structures in terms of both the backbone conformations and the placement of core side chains. Furthermore, the resulting models satisfy a particularly stringent test: they provide significantly better solutions to the X-ray crystallographic phase problem in molecular replacement trials. Finally, we show that all-atom refinement can produce de novo protein structure predictions that reach the high accuracy required for molecular replacement without any experimental phase information and in the absence of templates suitable for molecular replacement from the Protein Data Bank. These results suggest that the combination of high-resolution structure prediction with state-of-the-art phasing tools may be unexpectedly powerful in phasing crystallographic data for which molecular replacement is hindered by the absence of sufficiently accurate previous models.

Citing Articles

The success rate of processed predicted models in molecular replacement: implications for experimental phasing in the AlphaFold era.

Keegan R, Simpkin A, Rigden D Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2024; 80(Pt 11):766-779.

PMID: 39360967 PMC: 11544426. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798324009380.


Exploring stevioside binding affinity with various proteins and receptors actively involved in the signaling pathway and a future candidate for diabetic patients.

Khan S, Ahmad N, Fazal H, Saleh I, Abdel-Maksoud M, Malik A Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1377916.

PMID: 39170696 PMC: 11335537. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1377916.


Predicted models and CCP4.

Simpkin A, Caballero I, McNicholas S, Stevenson K, Jimenez E, Sanchez Rodriguez F Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2023; 79(Pt 9):806-819.

PMID: 37594303 PMC: 10478639. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798323006289.


Fusion of two unrelated protein domains in a chimera protein and its 3D prediction: Justification of the x-ray reference structures as a prediction benchmark.

Vymetal J, Mertova K, Bousova K, Sulc J, Tripsianes K, Vondrasek J Proteins. 2022; 90(12):2067-2079.

PMID: 35833233 PMC: 9796088. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26398.


MrParse: finding homologues in the PDB and the EBI AlphaFold database for molecular replacement and more.

Simpkin A, Thomas J, Keegan R, Rigden D Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2022; 78(Pt 5):553-559.

PMID: 35503204 PMC: 9063843. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798322003576.


References
1.
Takamoto K, Chance M . Radiolytic protein footprinting with mass spectrometry to probe the structure of macromolecular complexes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006; 35:251-76. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102050. View

2.
Dunbrack Jr R, Cohen F . Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 1997; 6(8):1661-81. PMC: 2143774. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060807. View

3.
Moult J, Fidelis K, Rost B, Hubbard T, Tramontano A . Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round 6. Proteins. 2005; 61 Suppl 7:3-7. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20716. View

4.
Grishaev A, Bax A . An empirical backbone-backbone hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins and its applications to NMR structure refinement and validation. J Am Chem Soc. 2004; 126(23):7281-92. DOI: 10.1021/ja0319994. View

5.
Lovell S, Davis I, Arendall 3rd W, de Bakker P, Word J, Prisant M . Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins. 2003; 50(3):437-50. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10286. View