» Articles » PMID: 15856480

Comparison of X-ray and NMR Structures: is There a Systematic Difference in Residue Contacts Between X-ray- and NMR-resolved Protein Structures?

Overview
Journal Proteins
Date 2005 Apr 28
PMID 15856480
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have compared structures of 78 proteins determined by both NMR and X-ray methods. It is shown that X-ray and NMR structures of the same protein have more differences than various X-ray structures obtained for the protein, and even more than various NMR structures of the protein. X-ray and NMR structures of 18 of these 78 proteins have obvious large-scale structural differences that seem to reflect a difference of crystal and solution structures. The other 60 pairs of structures have only small-scale differences comparable with differences between various X-ray or various NMR structures of a protein; we have analyzed these structures more attentively. One of the main differences between NMR and X-ray structures concerns the number of contacts per residue: (1) NMR structures presented in PDB have more contacts than X-ray structures at distances below 3.0 A and 4.5-6.5 A, and fewer contacts at distances of 3.0-4.5 A and 6.5-8.0 A; (2) this difference in the number of contacts is greater for internal residues than for external ones, and it is larger for beta-containing proteins than for all-alpha proteins. Another significant difference is that the main-chain hydrogen bonds identified in X-ray and NMR structures often differ. Their correlation is 69% only. However, analogous difference is found for refined and rerefined NMR structures, allowing us to suggest that the observed difference in interresidue contacts of X-ray and NMR structures of the same proteins is due mainly to a difference in mathematical treatment of experimental results.

Citing Articles

Highly acidic -triflylphosphoramides as chiral Brønsted acid catalysts: the effect of weak hydrogen bonds and multiple acceptors on complex structures and aggregation.

Hecht M, Dullinger P, Silva W, Horinek D, Gschwind R Chem Sci. 2024; 15(24):9104-9111.

PMID: 38903236 PMC: 11186309. DOI: 10.1039/d4sc01939c.


Core packing of well-defined X-ray and NMR structures is the same.

Grigas A, Liu Z, Regan L, OHern C Protein Sci. 2022; 31(8):e4373.

PMID: 35900019 PMC: 9277709. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4373.


Fusion of two unrelated protein domains in a chimera protein and its 3D prediction: Justification of the x-ray reference structures as a prediction benchmark.

Vymetal J, Mertova K, Bousova K, Sulc J, Tripsianes K, Vondrasek J Proteins. 2022; 90(12):2067-2079.

PMID: 35833233 PMC: 9796088. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26398.


PSnpBind: a database of mutated binding site protein-ligand complexes constructed using a multithreaded virtual screening workflow.

Ammar A, Cavill R, Evelo C, Willighagen E J Cheminform. 2022; 14(1):8.

PMID: 35227289 PMC: 8886843. DOI: 10.1186/s13321-021-00573-5.


Structural coordinates: A novel approach to predict protein backbone conformation.

Milchevskaya V, Nikitin A, Lukshin S, Filatov I, Kravatsky Y, Tumanyan V PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0239793.

PMID: 34014953 PMC: 8136669. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239793.