» Articles » PMID: 17767489

Cellular Dynamics Underlying Regeneration of Damaged Axons Differs from Initial Axon Development

Overview
Journal Eur J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 Sep 5
PMID 17767489
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While long-distance regeneration may be limited in mammalian species, it is becoming apparent that damaged mature neurons retain some capacity for attempted regeneration and that the adult CNS is not entirely inhibitory to axon growth. Our investigations show that there are critical intrinsic features of postinjury axonal regeneration that differ from initial axon development, and that these distinct differences may account for the limited and inappropriate regenerative response that currently characterizes the mature CNS. We compared the neurochemical and dynamic characteristics of developing axons to relatively mature regenerating axons, utilizing an in vitro model of axonal transection to long-term cultured rat cortical neurons. Immunolabelling studies revealed that regenerating and developing axons have a similar localization of cytoskeletal proteins, but the tips of regenerating axons, although morphologically similar, were smaller with reduced fillopodial extension, relative to developmental growth cones. Live imaging demonstrated that regenerating axons exhibited significantly less outgrowth than developmental neurites. Furthermore, growth cones of regenerating axons had a significant reduction in pausing, considered vital for interstitial branching and pathfinding, than did developmental growth cones. In addition, unlike developing axons, the regenerating axons were unresponsive to the growth factors BDNF and GDNF. Thus, although similar in their cytoskeletal composition, the growth cones of regenerative sprouts differed from their developmental counterparts in their size, their dynamic behaviour and their ability to respond to critical growth factors. These intrinsic differences may account for the inability of post-traumatic locally sprouting axons to make accurate pathway decisions and successfully respond to trauma.

Citing Articles

Tension- and Adhesion-Regulated Retraction of Injured Axons.

Shao X, You R, Hui T, Fang C, Gong Z, Yan Z Biophys J. 2019; 117(2):193-202.

PMID: 31278003 PMC: 6702139. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.06.011.


Mild and repetitive very mild axonal stretch injury triggers cystoskeletal mislocalization and growth cone collapse.

Yap Y, King A, Guijt R, Jiang T, Blizzard C, Breadmore M PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0176997.

PMID: 28472086 PMC: 5417565. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176997.


Contrasting developmental axon regrowth and neurite sprouting of Drosophila mushroom body neurons reveals shared and unique molecular mechanisms.

Marmor-Kollet N, Schuldiner O Dev Neurobiol. 2015; 76(3):262-76.

PMID: 26037037 PMC: 5113756. DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22312.


Increased Network Excitability Due to Altered Synaptic Inputs to Neocortical Layer V Intact and Axotomized Pyramidal Neurons after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Hanell A, Greer J, Jacobs K J Neurotrauma. 2015; 32(20):1590-8.

PMID: 25789412 PMC: 4593977. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3592.


A chemical screen identifies novel compounds that overcome glial-mediated inhibition of neuronal regeneration.

Usher L, Johnstone A, Erturk A, Hu Y, Strikis D, Wanner I J Neurosci. 2010; 30(13):4693-706.

PMID: 20357120 PMC: 2855497. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0302-10.2010.