» Articles » PMID: 17665178

Tool Use Changes Multisensory Interactions in Seconds: Evidence from the Crossmodal Congruency Task

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2007 Aug 1
PMID 17665178
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Active tool use in human and non-human primates has been claimed to alter the neural representations of multisensory peripersonal space. To date, most studies suggest that a short period of tool use leads to an expansion or elongation of these spatial representations, which lasts several minutes after the last tool use action. However, the possibility that multisensory interactions also change on a much shorter time scale following or preceding individual tool use movements has not yet been investigated. We measured crossmodal (visual-tactile) congruency effects as an index of multisensory integration during two tool use tasks. In the regular tool use task, the participants used one of two tools in a spatiotemporally predictable sequence after every fourth crossmodal congruency trial. In the random tool use task, the required timing and spatial location of the tool use task varied unpredictably. Multisensory integration effects increased as a function of the number of trials since tool use in the regular tool use group, but remained relatively constant in the random tool use group. The spatial distribution of these multisensory effects, however, was unaffected by tool use predictability, with significant spatial interactions found only near the hands and at the tips of the tools. These data suggest that endogenously preparing to use a tool enhances visual-tactile interactions near the tools. Such enhancements are likely due to the increased behavioural relevance of visual stimuli as each tool use action is prepared before execution.

Citing Articles

Knowing your boundaries: no effect of tool-use on body representation following a gather-and-sort task.

Bell J, Macuga K Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(9):2275-2285.

PMID: 37552269 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06669-8.


The different impact of attention, movement, and sensory information on body metric representation.

Caggiano P, Cocchini G, Stefano D, Romano D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(5):1044-1051.

PMID: 37382243 PMC: 11032629. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231187385.


Peripersonal space around the upper and the lower limbs.

Gherri E, Xu A, Ambron E, Sedda A Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(7-8):2039-2050.

PMID: 35727366 PMC: 9288357. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06387-7.


Peripersonal space in the front, rear, left and right directions for audio-tactile multisensory integration.

Matsuda Y, Sugimoto M, Inami M, Kitazaki M Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):11303.

PMID: 34050213 PMC: 8163804. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90784-5.


The toolish hand illusion: embodiment of a tool based on similarity with the hand.

Cardinali L, Zanini A, Yanofsky R, Roy A, de Vignemont F, Culham J Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):2024.

PMID: 33479395 PMC: 7820319. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81706-6.


References
1.
Ackroyd K, Riddoch M, Humphreys G, Nightingale S, Townsend S . Widening the sphere of influence: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase. 2002; 8(1-2):1-12. DOI: 10.1093/neucas/8.1.1. View

2.
Longo M, Lourenco S . On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 44(6):977-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.003. View

3.
Ladavas E, di Pellegrino G, Farne A, Zeloni G . Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998; 10(5):581-9. DOI: 10.1162/089892998562988. View

4.
Sarri M, Blankenburg F, Driver J . Neural correlates of crossmodal visual-tactile extinction and of tactile awareness revealed by fMRI in a right-hemisphere stroke patient. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(12):2398-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.032. View

5.
Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y . Attention-induced neuronal activity in the monkey somatosensory cortex revealed by pupillometrics. Neurosci Res. 1996; 25(2):173-81. DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(96)01043-7. View