» Articles » PMID: 31179180

Crossmodal Congruency Effect Scores Decrease with Repeat Test Exposure

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2019 Jun 11
PMID 31179180
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The incorporation of feedback into a person's body schema is well established. The crossmodal congruency task (CCT) is used to objectively quantify incorporation without being susceptible to experimenter biases. This visual-tactile interference task is used to calculate the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) score as a difference in response time between incongruent and congruent trials. Here we show that this metric is susceptible to a learning effect that causes attenuation of the CCE score due to repeated task exposure sessions. We demonstrate that this learning effect is persistent, even after a 6 month hiatus in testing. Two mitigation strategies are proposed: 1. Only use CCE scores that are taken after learning has stabilized, or 2. Use a modified CCT protocol that decreases the task exposure time. We show that the modified and shortened CCT protocol, which may be required to meet time or logistical constraints in laboratory or clinical settings, reduced the impact of the learning effect on CCT results. Importantly, the CCE scores from the modified protocol were not significantly more variable than results obtained with the original protocol. This study highlights the importance of considering exposure time to the CCT when designing experiments and suggests two mitigation strategies to improve the utility of this psychophysical assessment.

Citing Articles

Peri-hand space expands beyond reach in the context of walk-and-reach movements.

Berger M, Neumann P, Gail A Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):3013.

PMID: 30816205 PMC: 6395760. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39520-8.


Assessing the quality of supplementary sensory feedback using the crossmodal congruency task.

Blustein D, Wilson A, Sensinger J Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):6203.

PMID: 29670188 PMC: 5906608. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24560-3.

References
1.
Spence C, Kingstone A, Shore D, Gazzaniga M . Representation of visuotactile space in the split brain. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(1):90-3. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00316. View

2.
Spence C, Shore D, Gazzaniga M, Soto-Faraco S, Kingstone A . Failure to remap visuotactile space across the midline in the split-brain. Can J Exp Psychol. 2001; 55(2):133-40. DOI: 10.1037/h0087360. View

3.
Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J . Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition. 2002; 83(2):B25-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00003-3. View

4.
Collie A, Maruff P, Darby D, McStephen M . The effects of practice on the cognitive test performance of neurologically normal individuals assessed at brief test-retest intervals. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003; 9(3):419-28. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617703930074. View

5.
Maravita A, Spence C, Driver J . Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Curr Biol. 2003; 13(13):R531-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00449-4. View