» Articles » PMID: 27913817

The Contribution of Response Conflict, Multisensory Integration, and Body-mediated Attention to the Crossmodal Congruency Effect

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 Dec 4
PMID 27913817
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The crossmodal congruency task is a consolidated paradigm for investigating interactions between vision and touch. In this task, participants judge the elevation of a tactile target stimulus while ignoring a visual distracter stimulus that may occur at a congruent or incongruent elevation, thus engendering a measure of visuo-tactile interference (crossmodal congruency effect, CCE). The CCE reflects perceptual, attentional, and response-related factors, but their respective roles and interactions have not been set out yet. In two experiments, we used the original version of the crossmodal congruency task as well as ad hoc manipulations of the experimental setting and of the participants' posture for characterizing the contributions of multisensory integration, body-mediated attention, and response conflict to the CCE. Results of the two experiments consistently showed that the largest amount of variance in the CCE is explained by the reciprocal elevation of visual and tactile stimuli. This finding is compatible with a major role of response conflict for the CCE. Weaker yet distinguishable contributions come from multisensory integration, observed in the absence of response conflict, and from hand-mediated attentional binding, observed with the modified posture and in the presence of response conflict. Overall, this study informs the long-standing debate about mechanisms underlying the CCE by revealing that the visuo-tactile interference in this task is primarily due to the competition between opposite response tendencies, with an additional contribution of multisensory integration and hand-mediated attentional binding.

Citing Articles

The left-right reversed visual feedback of the hand affects multisensory interaction within peripersonal space.

Mine D, Narumi T Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 86(1):285-294.

PMID: 37759149 PMC: 10769940. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02788-0.


Peripersonal Space from a multisensory perspective: the distinct effect of the visual and tactile components of Visuo-Tactile stimuli.

Beccherle M, Facchetti S, Villani F, Zanini M, Scandola M Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(4):1205-1217.

PMID: 35178603 PMC: 9015983. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06324-8.


Cognitive Training Improves Disconnected Limbs' Mental Representation and Peripersonal Space after Spinal Cord Injury.

Moro V, Corbella M, Ionta S, Ferrari F, Scandola M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(18).

PMID: 34574514 PMC: 8470420. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189589.


When irrelevant information helps: Extending the Eriksen-flanker task into a multisensory world.

Merz S, Frings C, Spence C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020; 83(2):776-789.

PMID: 32514664 PMC: 7884353. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02066-3.


Extending the study of visual attention to a multisensory world (Charles W. Eriksen Special Issue).

Spence C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020; 83(2):763-775.

PMID: 32419052 PMC: 7884363. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02061-8.


References
1.
Longo M, Musil J, Haggard P . Visuo-tactile integration in personal space. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011; 24(3):543-52. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00158. View

2.
Ernst M, Bulthoff H . Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(4):162-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002. View

3.
Busse L, Roberts K, Crist R, Weissman D, Woldorff M . The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(51):18751-6. PMC: 1317940. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507704102. View

4.
Baylis G, Driver J . Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors. Percept Psychophys. 1992; 51(2):145-62. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212239. View

5.
Driver J, Spence C . Crossmodal attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998; 8(2):245-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80147-5. View