Impact of High Energy Resolution Detectors on the Performance of a PET System Dedicated to Breast Cancer Imaging
Overview
General Medicine
Affiliations
We are developing a high resolution, high sensitivity PET camera dedicated to breast cancer imaging. We are studying two novel detector technologies for this imaging system: a scintillation detector comprising layers of small lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) crystals coupled to new position sensitive avalanche photodiodes (PSAPDs), and a pure semiconductor detector comprising cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) crystal slabs with thin anode and cathode strips deposited in orthogonal directions on either side of each slab. Both detectors achieve 1 mm spatial resolution with 3-5 mm directly measured photon interaction depth resolution, which promotes uniform reconstructed spatial resolution throughout a compact, breast-size field of view. Both detector types also achieve outstanding energy resolution (<3% and <12%, respectively for LSO-PSAPD and CZT at 511 keV). This paper studies the effects that this excellent energy resolution has on the expected system performance. Results indicate the importance that high energy resolution and narrow energy window settings have in reducing background random as well as scatter coincidences without compromising statistical quality of the dedicated breast PET data. Simulations predict that using either detector type the excellent performance and novel arrangement of these detectors proposed for the system facilitate approximately 20% instrument sensitivity at the system center and a peak noise-equivalent count rate of >4 kcps for 200 microCi in a simulated breast phantom.
Development of broad-band high-reflectivity multilayer film for positron emission tomography system.
Xu J, Sun Q, Wu Z, Guo L, Xie S, Huang Q J Instrum. 2021; 13(9).
PMID: 33828611 PMC: 8022915. DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/13/09/p09016.
Effect of CZT system characteristics on Compton scatter event recovery.
Yang S, Li M, Reed M, Hugg J, Chen H, Abbaszadeh S IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2020; 4(1):91-97.
PMID: 31922083 PMC: 6952068. DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2019.2915054.
Zhang X, Xie S, Yang J, Weng F, Xu J, Huang Q Med Phys. 2019; 46(8):3385-3398.
PMID: 31107969 PMC: 6692193. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13603.
Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.
Eric Berg , Cherry S Semin Nucl Med. 2018; 48(4):311-331.
PMID: 29852942 PMC: 5986096. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.02.006.
Simulation study of quantitative precision of the PET/X dedicated breast PET scanner.
Zeng C, Kinahan P, Qian H, Harrison R, Champley K, MacDonald L J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017; 4(4):045502.
PMID: 29134188 PMC: 5661484. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.4.045502.