» Articles » PMID: 17626644

Housekeeping Genes Tend to Show Reduced Upstream Sequence Conservation

Overview
Journal Genome Biol
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2007 Jul 14
PMID 17626644
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Understanding the constraints that operate in mammalian gene promoter sequences is of key importance to understand the evolution of gene regulatory networks. The level of promoter conservation varies greatly across orthologous genes, denoting differences in the strength of the evolutionary constraints. Here we test the hypothesis that the number of tissues in which a gene is expressed is related in a significant manner to the extent of promoter sequence conservation.

Results: We show that mammalian housekeeping genes, expressed in all or nearly all tissues, show significantly lower promoter sequence conservation, especially upstream of position -500 with respect to the transcription start site, than genes expressed in a subset of tissues. In addition, we evaluate the effect of gene function, CpG island content and protein evolutionary rate on promoter sequence conservation. Finally, we identify a subset of transcription factors that bind to motifs that are specifically over-represented in housekeeping gene promoters.

Conclusion: This is the first report that shows that the promoters of housekeeping genes show reduced sequence conservation with respect to genes expressed in a more tissue-restricted manner. This is likely to be related to simpler gene expression, requiring a smaller number of functional cis-regulatory motifs.

Citing Articles

CHD6 eviction of promoter nucleosomes maintains housekeeping transcriptional program in prostate cancer.

Bu L, Huang S, Rao Z, Wu C, Sun B, Liu Y Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2024; 35(4):102397.

PMID: 39717618 PMC: 11665337. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102397.


Transcriptional repression and enhancer decommissioning silence cell cycle genes in postmitotic tissues.

Fogarty E, Buchert E, Ma Y, Nicely A, Buttitta L G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39171889 PMC: 11457063. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae203.


Transcriptional repression and enhancer decommissioning silence cell cycle genes in postmitotic tissues.

Fogarty E, Buchert E, Ma Y, Nicely A, Buttitta L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38766255 PMC: 11100713. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.06.592773.


Regulatory architecture of housekeeping genes is driven by promoter assemblies.

Dejosez M, DallAgnese A, Ramamoorthy M, Platt J, Yin X, Hogan M Cell Rep. 2023; 42(5):112505.

PMID: 37182209 PMC: 10329844. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112505.


A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression.

Colbran L, Ramos-Almodovar F, Mathieson I Genetics. 2023; 224(2).

PMID: 37036411 PMC: 10213495. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad060.


References
1.
Vinogradov A . "Genome design" model: evidence from conserved intronic sequence in human-mouse comparison. Genome Res. 2006; 16(3):347-54. PMC: 1415212. DOI: 10.1101/gr.4318206. View

2.
Waterston R, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril J, Agarwal P . Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002; 420(6915):520-62. DOI: 10.1038/nature01262. View

3.
Matys V, Fricke E, Geffers R, Gossling E, Haubrock M, Hehl R . TRANSFAC: transcriptional regulation, from patterns to profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(1):374-8. PMC: 165555. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg108. View

4.
Trinklein N, Aldred S, Saldanha A, Myers R . Identification and functional analysis of human transcriptional promoters. Genome Res. 2003; 13(2):308-12. PMC: 420378. DOI: 10.1101/gr.794803. View

5.
Kelso J, Visagie J, Theiler G, Christoffels A, Bardien S, Smedley D . eVOC: a controlled vocabulary for unifying gene expression data. Genome Res. 2003; 13(6A):1222-30. PMC: 403650. DOI: 10.1101/gr.985203. View