» Articles » PMID: 17541656

Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA Assay on the SmartCycler Real-time PCR Platform for Rapid Detection of MRSA from Screening Specimens

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2007 Jun 2
PMID 17541656
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapid accurate detection is a prerequisite for the successful control of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The IDI-MRSA real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was designed to provide rapid results from nasal specimens collected in Stuart's liquid transport medium. This study has evaluated the IDI-MRSA kit for use in a clinical laboratory by investigating the following parameters: (1) limits of detection (LoD), (2) performance with Amies' gel-based transport medium, (3) ability to detect strains of MRSA in a collection representative of MRSA in Ireland since 1974 (n=113) and (4) performance in a clinical trial with swabs from nose, throat and groin/perineum sites from 202 patients. LoDs (colony-forming units per ml) of the IDI-MRSA kit, direct culture on MRSA-Select chromogenic agar (CA) and salt-enrichment culture (with subculture onto CA) were 10(3), 10(3) and 10(2), respectively. LoDs with Stuart's and Amies' transport media were comparable. All except one of the 113 MRSA isolates were detected by the kit but, when six control strains carrying staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV element subtypes IVa-d and SCCmec types V and V(T) were tested, the kit failed to detect MRSA carrying SCCmec V. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of MRSA from nose, throat and groin/perineum specimens were comparable with slightly lower sensitivities from throat and groin/perineum specimens compared with nasal swabs (90%, 97%; 89%, 99%; 88%, 99%, respectively). Overall sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for specimens from all sites were 88%, 99%, 94% and 97%, respectively. Further developments to improve the sensitivity of this highly worthwhile assay are required.

Citing Articles

Comparative evaluation of two fully-automated real-time PCR methods for MRSA admission screening in a tertiary-care hospital.

Hos N, Wiegel P, Fischer J, Plum G Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016; 35(9):1475-8.

PMID: 27259711 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-016-2687-8.


Bacterial nanoscale cultures for phenotypic multiplexed antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Weibull E, Antypas H, KjAll P, Brauner A, Andersson-Svahn H, Richter-Dahlfors A J Clin Microbiol. 2014; 52(9):3310-7.

PMID: 24989602 PMC: 4313156. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01161-14.


Recombinations in staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements compromise the molecular detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Hill-Cawthorne G, Hudson L, El Ghany M, Piepenburg O, Nair M, Dodgson A PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e101419.

PMID: 24972080 PMC: 4074205. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101419.


BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly in nasal and non-nasal swab specimens from haematologic patients.

Ghebremedhin B, Konig B, Konig W Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2014; 1(4):297-301.

PMID: 24516736 PMC: 3918132. DOI: 10.1556/EuJMI.1.2011.4.5.


Medical and household characteristics associated with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among patients admitted to a rural tertiary care hospital.

Schinasi L, Wing S, MacDonald P, Richardson D, Stewart J, Augustino K PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e73595.

PMID: 23991200 PMC: 3753306. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073595.


References
1.
Boyle-Vavra S, Ereshefsky B, Wang C, Daum R . Successful multiresistant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from Taipei, Taiwan, that carries either the novel Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type VT or SCCmec type IV. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(9):4719-30. PMC: 1234068. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4719-4730.2005. View

2.
Warren D, Liao R, Merz L, Eveland M, Dunne Jr W . Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(12):5578-81. PMC: 535250. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5578-5581.2004. View

3.
Oliveira D, Tomasz A, de Lencastre H . Secrets of success of a human pathogen: molecular evolution of pandemic clones of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002; 2(3):180-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00227-x. View

4.
Ben Nsira S, Dupuis M, Leclercq R . Evaluation of MRSA Select, a new chromogenic medium for the detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006; 27(6):561-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.03.011. View

5.
Chongtrakool P, Ito T, Ma X, Kondo Y, Trakulsomboon S, Tiensasitorn C . Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in 11 Asian countries: a proposal for a new nomenclature for SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 50(3):1001-12. PMC: 1426434. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.50.3.1001-1012.2006. View