» Articles » PMID: 17384220

Assessment of the Frequency of Allelic Imbalance in Human Tissue Using a Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction System

Overview
Journal J Mol Diagn
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2007 Mar 27
PMID 17384220
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic instability can generate chromosome breakage and fusion randomly throughout the genome, frequently resulting in allelic imbalance, a deviation from the normal 1:1 ratio of maternal and paternal alleles. Allelic imbalance reflects the karyotypic complexity of the cancer genome. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that tissues with more sites of allelic imbalance have a greater likelihood of having disruption of any of the numerous critical genes that cause a cancerous phenotype and thus may have diagnostic or prognostic significance. For this reason, it is desirable to develop a robust method to assess the frequency of allelic imbalance in any tissue. To address this need, we designed an economical and high-throughput method, based on the Applied Biosystems AmpFlSTR Identifiler multiplex polymerase chain reaction system, to evaluate allelic imbalance at 16 unlinked, microsatellite loci located throughout the genome. This method provides a quantitative comparison of the extent of allelic imbalance between samples that can be applied to a variety of frozen and archival tissues. The method does not require matched normal tissue, requires little DNA (the equivalent of approximately 150 cells) and uses commercially available reagents, instrumentation, and analysis software. Greater than 99% of tissue specimens with >or=2 unbalanced loci were cancerous.

Citing Articles

High frequency of microsatellite instability and its substantial co-existence with and mutations in Vietnamese patients with colorectal cancer.

Nguyen H, Le D, Duong Q, Tatipamula V, Van Nguyen B Oncol Lett. 2020; 21(1):41.

PMID: 33262833 PMC: 7693389. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12302.


Malignant tumors and forensics--dilemmas and proposals.

Budimlija Z, Lu C, Axler-DiPerte G, Seifarth J, Popiolek D, Fogt F Croat Med J. 2009; 50(3):218-27.

PMID: 19480018 PMC: 2702737. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.218.


Genomic instability demonstrates similarity between DCIS and invasive carcinomas.

Heaphy C, Bisoffi M, Joste N, Baumgartner K, Baumgartner R, Griffith J Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 117(1):17-24.

PMID: 18785004 PMC: 2728157. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0165-4.

References
1.
Lips E, Dierssen J, van Eijk R, Oosting J, Eilers P, Tollenaar R . Reliable high-throughput genotyping and loss-of-heterozygosity detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(22):10188-91. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2486. View

2.
Payne S, Kemp C . Tumor suppressor genetics. Carcinogenesis. 2005; 26(12):2031-45. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi223. View

3.
Meaburn E, Butcher L, Schalkwyk L, Plomin R . Genotyping pooled DNA using 100K SNP microarrays: a step towards genomewide association scans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(4):e27. PMC: 1368655. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gnj027. View

4.
Hanahan D, Weinberg R . The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000; 100(1):57-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. View

5.
Gray J, Collins C . Genome changes and gene expression in human solid tumors. Carcinogenesis. 2000; 21(3):443-52. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/21.3.443. View