» Articles » PMID: 18985100

Medial Prefrontal Dissociations During Processing of Trait Diagnostic and Nondiagnostic Person Information

Overview
Date 2008 Nov 6
PMID 18985100
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research has suggested that perceivers spontaneously extract trait-specific information from the behaviour of others. However, little is known about whether perceivers spontaneously engage in the same depth of social-cognitive processing for all person information or reserve such processing specifically for information that conveys diagnostic clues about another person's dispositions. Moreover, a question remains as to whether the processing of such nondiagnostic information can be affected by perceivers' explicit goal to consider another's dispositions or not. To examine processing of diagnostic and nondiagnostic social information as a function of perceivers' explicit social-cognitive goals, participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning while performing social (impression formation) or non-social orienting tasks using statements that conveyed either diagnostic or nondiagnostic information about the target's personality traits. Replicating two earlier studies, results identified a region of dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) that was preferentially activated by impression formation. Interestingly, no difference between trait-diagnostic and nondiagnostic information was observed when participants had the explicit goal of forming an impression, but a substantial effect of diagnosticity emerged when task instructions oriented them away from considering the target as a social agent. These results suggest that trait-nondiagnostic information is not subject to spontaneous social-cognitive processing, but that such processing may nevertheless occur when perceivers have the explicit goal to use that information to form an impression of a target.

Citing Articles

Memory as a foundation for approach and avoidance decisions: A fertile area for research.

Sklenar A, Leshikar E Mem Cognit. 2024; 53(2):590-605.

PMID: 38848018 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01588-7.


Two is company: The posterior cerebellum and sequencing for pairs versus individuals during social preference prediction.

Haihambo N, Ma Q, Baetens K, Bylemans T, Heleven E, Baeken C Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023; 23(6):1482-1499.

PMID: 37821755 PMC: 10684703. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01127-y.


Sleep loss leads to the withdrawal of human helping across individuals, groups, and large-scale societies.

Ben Simon E, Vallat R, Rossi A, Walker M PLoS Biol. 2022; 20(8):e3001733.

PMID: 35998121 PMC: 9398015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001733.


The posterior cerebellum and social action sequences in a cooperative context.

Pu M, Heleven E, Ma Q, Bylemans T, Baetens K, Haihambo N Cerebellum. 2022; 22(4):559-577.

PMID: 35648333 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01420-5.


Distinctive roles of mPFC subregions in forming impressions and guiding social interaction based on others' social behaviour.

Lim G, Kim H Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022; 17(12):1118-1130.

PMID: 35579251 PMC: 9714428. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsac037.


References
1.
Gusnard D, Raichle M . Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(10):685-94. DOI: 10.1038/35094500. View

2.
Uleman J, Moskowitz G . Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66(3):490-501. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.3.490. View

3.
Gallagher H, Frith C . Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00025-6. View

4.
Srull T, WYER Jr R . Person memory and judgment. Psychol Rev. 1989; 96(1):58-83. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.1.58. View

5.
Goel V, Grafman J, Sadato N, Hallett M . Modeling other minds. Neuroreport. 1995; 6(13):1741-6. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199509000-00009. View