» Articles » PMID: 17167244

Informed Consent and Subject Motivation to Participate in a Large, Population-based Genomics Study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project

Overview
Journal Community Genet
Publisher Karger
Specialty Health Services
Date 2006 Dec 15
PMID 17167244
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to measure subject perspective and reaction to participation in the Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP) and to identify factors predicting understanding of the study elements.

Method: Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to 1,593 subjects (10% sample). The questionnaire had three sections: section A consisted of 21 factual questions; section B consisted of 14 questions to assess the level of understanding about the PMRP concepts, and section C asked about the purpose of the PMRP.

Results: The mean age of the 924 survey respondents was 52 years (SD = 16.9), with a range of 18-95 years. The majority of participants were female (n = 561, 61%). The percent of total correct responses for section A was significantly higher for females compared with males (males: 58.4% and females: 60.4%, t test = -2.18, p = 0.03) and age was significantly inversely related to percent of correct responses (beta coefficient = -0.122, p < 0.001). More than one third of the participants indicated that the USD 20 greatly influenced their decision to participate in the project. In a multiple logistic regression model, people living outside of Marshfield were significantly more likely to indicate that the USD 20 greatly influenced their decision to participate (odds ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence limit = 1.06, 1.86) and age was inversely related to the monetary influence on decision to participate (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence limit = 0.97, 0.98).

Conclusion: Future community consultation efforts should highlight areas of lower understanding. In addition, research coordinators may need to take more time informing males and older individuals about project details so that they are making truly informed decisions about study participation.

Citing Articles

Factors Influencing Informed Consent Preferences in Digital Health Research: Survey Study of Prospective Participants.

McInnis B, Pindus R, Kareem D, Vital D, Hekler E, Nebeker C J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e63349.

PMID: 39847412 PMC: 11803319. DOI: 10.2196/63349.


Trust in prenatal exome sequencing for expectant families facing unexplained fetal anomalies.

Rothschild H, Lianoglou B, Sahin Hodoglugil N, Tick K, Brown J, Sparks T Prenat Diagn. 2023; 44(3):263-269.

PMID: 38158591 PMC: 10947859. DOI: 10.1002/pd.6507.


Parents' understanding of genome and exome sequencing for pediatric health conditions: a systematic review.

Gereis J, Hetherington K, Ha L, Robertson E, Ziegler D, Barlow-Stewart K Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(11):1216-1225.

PMID: 35999452 PMC: 9626631. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01170-2.


Understanding of Critical Elements of Informed Consent in Genomic Research: A Case of a Paediatric HIV-TB Research Project in Uganda.

Amayoa F, Nakwagala F, Barugahare J, Munabi I, Mwaka E J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022; 17(4):483-493.

PMID: 35548950 PMC: 9398965. DOI: 10.1177/15562646221100430.


Mining the Data: Exploring Rural Patients' Attitudes about the Use of Their Personal Information in Research.

McCormick J, Hopkins M, Lehman E, Green M AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022; 13(2):89-106.

PMID: 35271430 PMC: 10038193. DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2040644.