Mining the Data: Exploring Rural Patients' Attitudes About the Use of Their Personal Information in Research

Overview

Journal AJOB Empir Bioeth

Specialties General Medicine
Medical Ethics

Date 2022 Mar 10

PMID 35271430

Authors

Jennifer B McCormick

Margaret Hopkins

Erik B Lehman

Michael J Green

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This study examines rural patients' perceived importance of knowing or being consulted about researchers' access and use of their personal data (identifiable and de-identified health information, and identifiable and de-identified non-health information) across five scenarios. This study also examines their views on stewardship or governance of their personal information by researchers in their healthcare systems.

Methods: We conducted a survey by mail. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted across each scenario and type of personal data with the same variables included in each model.

Results: The majority of participants said it was "very important/absolutely essential" to know the purpose of the study, to be asked every time, and to know the policies governing researcher access and use of their identifiable health information. Just over two-thirds of respondents thought it "very important/absolutely essential" to know who serves on the data governance committee and to have a community member serve. Distrust in healthcare organizations was positively correlated with the scenarios while willingness to give permission to donate leftover biological specimens was negatively correlated.

Conclusion: Our study findings indicate that the type of personal information being accessed and used generally matters to 1,407 patients living in rural Pennsylvania. We also demonstrate that knowing their healthcare organizations' governance policies and practices for managing their personal data is important to many rural Pennsylvania patients. Biomedical researchers need to recognize and attend to those differences as much as possible in order to expand opportunities for and participation in research by residents of these rural communities.

Citing Articles

Patients' and Members of the Public's Wishes Regarding Transparency in the Context of Secondary Use of Health Data: Scoping Review.

Cumyn A, Menard J, Barton A, Dault R, Levesque F, Ethier J J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45002.

PMID: 37052967 PMC: 10141314. DOI: 10.2196/45002.

References

Henderson G, Edwards T, Cadigan R, Davis A, Zimmer C, Conlon I . Stewardship practices of U.S. biobanks. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5(215):215cm7. PMC: 4185188. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007362. View

Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S . Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health. 2015; 129(6):611-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001. View

Aitken M, de St Jorre J, Pagliari C, Jepson R, Cunningham-Burley S . Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Med Ethics. 2016; 17(1):73. PMC: 5103425. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x. View

Hartzler A, McCarty C, Rasmussen L, Williams M, Brilliant M, Bowton E . Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records. Genet Med. 2013; 15(10):792-801. PMC: 3909653. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.127. View

Ludman E, Fullerton S, Spangler L, Trinidad S, Fujii M, Jarvik G . Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010; 5(3):9-16. PMC: 3071850. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.9. View

Nelms E, Wang L, Pennell M, Wewers M, Seiber E, Adolph M . Trust in physicians among rural Medicaid-enrolled smokers. J Rural Health. 2014; 30(2):214-20. PMC: 3994402. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12046. View

Greenberg A, Haney D, Blake K, Moser R, Hesse B . Differences in Access to and Use of Electronic Personal Health Information Between Rural and Urban Residents in the United States. J Rural Health. 2017; 34 Suppl 1:s30-s38. PMC: 5505819. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12228. View

Kaufman D, Baker R, Milner L, Devaney S, Hudson K . A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment. PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0160461. PMC: 4988644. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160461. View

McCarty C, Nair A, Austin D, Giampietro P . Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project. Community Genet. 2006; 10(1):2-9. DOI: 10.1159/000096274. View

10.

OBrien E, Rodriguez A, Kum H, Schanberg L, Fitz-Randolph M, OBrien S . Patient perspectives on the linkage of health data for research: Insights from an online patient community questionnaire. Int J Med Inform. 2019; 127:9-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.003. View

11.

Cacari Stone L, Roary M, Diana A, Grady P . State health disparities research in Rural America: Gaps and future directions in an era of COVID-19. J Rural Health. 2021; 37(3):460-466. PMC: 8250657. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12562. View

12.

Oetzel J, Villegas M, Zenone H, White Hat E, Wallerstein N, Duran B . Enhancing stewardship of community-engaged research through governance. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(6):1161-7. PMC: 4431111. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302457. View

13.

Fischer E, McSweeney J, Wright P, Cheney A, Curran G, Henderson K . Overcoming Barriers to Sustained Engagement in Mental Health Care: Perspectives of Rural Veterans and Providers. J Rural Health. 2016; 32(4):429-438. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12203. View

14.

Probst J, Crouch E, Eberth J . COVID-19 risk mitigation behaviors among rural and urban community-dwelling older adults in summer, 2020. J Rural Health. 2021; 37(3):473-478. PMC: 8242629. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12600. View

15.

Oliver J, Slashinski M, Wang T, Kelly P, Hilsenbeck S, McGuire A . Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives. Public Health Genomics. 2012; 15(2):106-14. PMC: 3318928. DOI: 10.1159/000334718. View

16.

Botkin J, Rothwell E, Anderson R, Stark L, Mitchell J . Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research. J Community Genet. 2013; 5(3):205-13. PMC: 4059848. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0175-8. View

17.

Briscoe F, Ajunwa I, Gaddis A, McCormick J . Evolving public views on the value of one's DNA and expectations for genomic database governance: Results from a national survey. PLoS One. 2020; 15(3):e0229044. PMC: 7065739. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229044. View

18.

Ormond K, Cirino A, Helenowski I, Chisholm R, Wolf W . Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A. 2009; 149A(2):188-98. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32635. View

19.

McCaughey T, Chen C, De Smit E, Rees G, Fenwick E, Kearns L . Participant understanding and recall of informed consent for induced pluripotent stem cell biobanking. Cell Tissue Bank. 2016; 17(3):449-56. DOI: 10.1007/s10561-016-9563-8. View

20.

Smith S, Blake K, Olson C, Tessaro I . Community entry in conducting rural focus groups: process, legitimacy, and lessons learned. J Rural Health. 2002; 18(1):118-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00883.x. View