» Articles » PMID: 17078061

Inverse Drug Screens: a Rapid and Inexpensive Method for Implicating Molecular Targets

Overview
Journal Genesis
Date 2006 Nov 2
PMID 17078061
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identification of gene products that function in some specific process of interest is a common goal in developmental biology. Although use of drug compounds to probe biological systems has a very long history in teratology and toxicology, systematic hierarchical drug screening has not been capitalized upon by the developmental biology community. This "chemical genetics" approach can greatly benefit the study of embryonic and regenerative systems, and we have formalized a strategy for using known pharmacological compounds to implicate specific molecular candidates in any chosen biological phenomenon. Taking advantage of a hierarchical structure that can be imposed on drug reagents in a number of fields such as ion transport, neurotransmitter function, metabolism, and cytoskeleton, any assay can be carried out as a binary search algorithm. This inverse drug screen methodology is much more efficient than exhaustive testing of large numbers of drugs, and reveals the identity of a manageable number of specific molecular candidates that can then be validated and targeted using more expensive and specific molecular reagents. Here, we describe the process of this loss-of-function screen and illustrate its use in uncovering novel bioelectrical and serotonergic mechanisms in embryonic patterning. This technique is an inexpensive and rapid complement to existing molecular screening strategies. Moreover, it is applicable to maternal proteins, and model species in which traditional genetic screens are not feasible, significantly extending the opportunities to identify key endogenous players in biological processes.

Citing Articles

Identification of Distinct, Quantitative Pattern Classes from Emergent Tissue-Scale hiPSC Bioelectric Properties.

Norfleet D, Melendez A, Alting C, Kannan S, Nikitina A, Caldeira Botelho R Cells. 2024; 13(13.

PMID: 38994988 PMC: 11240333. DOI: 10.3390/cells13131136.


Bioelectric Properties of Myogenic Progenitor Cells.

Fennelly C, Soker S Bioelectricity. 2021; 1(1):35-45.

PMID: 34471807 PMC: 8370254. DOI: 10.1089/bioe.2018.0002.


Substratum stiffness tunes membrane voltage in mammary epithelial cells.

Silver B, Zhang S, Rabie E, Nelson C J Cell Sci. 2021; 134(13).

PMID: 34313313 PMC: 8310660. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.256313.


Effect of PEDOT:PSS in tissue engineering composite scaffold on improvement and maintenance of endothelial cell function.

Hesam Mahmoudinezhad M, Karkhaneh A, Jadidi K J Biosci. 2018; 43(2):307-319.

PMID: 29872019


The Bioelectric Code: Reprogramming Cancer and Aging From the Interface of Mechanical and Chemical Microenvironments.

Silver B, Nelson C Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018; 6:21.

PMID: 29560350 PMC: 5845671. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00021.


References
1.
Rampe D, Anderson B, Li T, Dage R . Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo cardiovascular effects of two structurally distinct Ca++ channel activators, BAY K 8644 and FPL 64176. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993; 265(3):1125-30. View

2.
Levin M . The embryonic origins of left-right asymmetry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004; 15(4):197-206. DOI: 10.1177/154411130401500403. View

3.
Yeh J, Crews C . Chemical genetics: adding to the developmental biology toolbox. Dev Cell. 2003; 5(1):11-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00200-4. View

4.
Mitchison T . Towards a pharmacological genetics. Chem Biol. 1994; 1(1):3-6. DOI: 10.1016/1074-5521(94)90034-5. View

5.
Pradervand S, Maurya M, Subramaniam S . Identification of signaling components required for the prediction of cytokine release in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Genome Biol. 2006; 7(2):R11. PMC: 1431720. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-2-r11. View