Ultrasound Guidance Improves the Success Rate of a Perivascular Axillary Plexus Block
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Traditional approaches to performing brachial plexus blocks via the axillary approach have varying success rates. The main objective of this study was to evaluate if a specific technique of ultrasound guidance could improve the success of axillary blocks in comparison to a two injection transarterial technique.
Methods: Fifty-six ASA physical status I-III patients presenting for elective hand surgery were prospectively randomized to receive an axillary block performed by either a transarterial technique (Group TA) or an ultrasound-guided perivascular approach (Group US). Both groups received a total of 30 ml of 1.5% lidocaine (225 mg) with 5 microg/ml epinephrine. Patients were then evaluated for block onset in specific nerve distributions and whether or not the block acted as a surgical anesthetic.
Results: Group TA sustained more failures defined as conversion to general anesthesia or the inability to localize the artery [Group TA eight patients (29%) vs. Group US in which 0 patients required conversion to general anesthesia (0%) P < 0.01]. Group US demonstrated a reduction in performance times vs. Group TA (7.9 +/- 3.9 min vs. 11.1 +/- 5.7 min, P < 0.05). By 30 min post-injection, there were no significant differences between groups TA and US in terms of the proportion of patients demonstrating a complete motor or sensory loss.
Conclusion: Ultrasonographic guidance improves the overall success rate of axillary blocks in comparison to a transarterial technique.
Vastus lateralis nerve block for knee hardware removal.
Ikram J, Srinivasan A, Williams C, Swerchowsky N, Ayad S Saudi J Anaesth. 2025; 19(1):112-114.
PMID: 39958281 PMC: 11829671. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_454_24.
Wang S, Fang H, Qin J, Liu W, Wang W, Pei Y Can J Anaesth. 2022; 70(1):106-115.
PMID: 36109453 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02327-9.
Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular vs. axillary brachial plexus block: A randomized clinical study.
Nalini K, Bevinaguddaiah Y, Thiyagarajan B, Shivasankar A, Pujari V J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 37(4):655-660.
PMID: 35340944 PMC: 8944354. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_43_20.
Kaye A, Allampalli V, Fisher P, Kaye A, Tran A, Cornett E Anesth Pain Med. 2022; 11(5):e120658.
PMID: 35075423 PMC: 8782193. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.120658.
Erdogmus N, Baskan S, Zengin M, Demirelli G Cureus. 2021; 13(8):e16865.
PMID: 34513440 PMC: 8413900. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16865.