» Articles » PMID: 29588614

Practice and Bias in Intraoperative Pain Management: Results of a Cross-sectional Patient Study and a Survey of Anesthesiologists

Overview
Journal J Pain Res
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2018 Mar 29
PMID 29588614
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Perioperative pain carries a considerable risk of becoming persistent; hence aggressive preventive approaches are advocated. Persistently high prevalence of postoperative pain, however, suggests anesthesiologists underuse these strategies. A prospective cross-sectional study of patients in the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) and a survey of anesthesiologists were thus conducted to evaluate practice and uncover bias in intraoperative pain management.

Methods: Notes of PACU patients were reviewed and information regarding surgical context, comorbidities, and analgesic administration was retrieved. Variables were analyzed for their predictive properties on pain and intraoperative analgesic management. Furthermore, clinical dose-effect estimates for intraoperative morphine were determined. Finally, anesthesiologists completed a questionnaire comprising statements regarding pain relating to surgical context and morphine administration.

Results: Data of 200 patients and 55 anesthesiologists were analyzed. Prevalence of pain in PACU was 28% and was predicted by local anesthetic (LA) and low-dose morphine administration. Additionally, when LA was used, little coanalgesics were employed. These results suggest a restrained approach by anesthesiologists toward intraoperative pain management. It is supported by their reluctance to administer more than 10 mg morphine, despite these individuals regarding this practice as insufficient. The hesitancy toward morphine also transpired in the dose-effect estimates with the average applied dose operating on an ED instead of an ED level.

Conclusion: This study confirmed a high prevalence of pain in PACU. It also indicated conservative intraoperative analgesic administration by anesthesiologists. The modest morphine usage and overreliance on LA application, which are not supported by published evidence, additionally suggest bias in current intraoperative pain management.

Citing Articles

EEG responses to standardised noxious stimulation during clinical anaesthesia: a pilot study.

Anders M, Anders B, Dreismickenbecker E, Hight D, Kreuzer M, Walter C BJA Open. 2023; 5:100118.

PMID: 37587999 PMC: 10430841. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100118.


The influence of personal values and patient intoxication on nurses concerns about opioids: results of a prospective cross-sectional multi-centre study.

Heckroth A, Pludra V, Johannssen C, Guest C, Wiedermann F, Bantel C Br J Pain. 2021; 15(1):40-53.

PMID: 33628441 PMC: 7882770. DOI: 10.1177/2049463719880333.


Pain And The Use Of Gabapentinoids In German Nursing Home Residents - Results From An Analysis Based On Statutory Health Insurance Data.

Bantel C, Hoffmann F, Jobski K J Pain Res. 2019; 12:3175-3184.

PMID: 31819602 PMC: 6878919. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S221579.

References
1.
Bantel C, Laycock H, Nagy I . The potential use of biomarkers and new diagnostic tools in the management of acute pain. Pain Manag. 2014; 2(3):187-90. DOI: 10.2217/pmt.12.11. View

2.
Sites B, Beach M, Spence B, Wiley C, Shiffrin J, Hartman G . Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular axillary plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006; 50(6):678-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01042.x. View

3.
Ip H, Abrishami A, Peng P, Wong J, Chung F . Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111(3):657-77. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae87a. View

4.
Katoh T, Suguro Y, Kimura T, Ikeda K . Morphine does not affect the awakening concentration of sevoflurane. Can J Anaesth. 1993; 40(9):825-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF03009252. View

5.
Yentis S . Decision analysis in anaesthesia: a tool for developing and analysing clinical management plans. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61(7):651-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04649.x. View