» Articles » PMID: 23814648

Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block According to the Various Volumes of Local Anesthetic

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2013 Jul 2
PMID 23814648
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The ultrasound guidance in regional nerve blocks has recently been introduced and gaining popularity. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block has many advantages including the higher success rate, faster onset time, and fewer complications. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical data according to the varied volume of local anesthetics in the ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block.

Methods: ONE HUNDRED TWENTY PATIENTS WERE RANDOMIZED INTO FOUR GROUPS, ACCORDING TO THE LOCAL ANESTHETIC VOLUME USED: Group 35 (n = 30), Group 30 (n = 30), Group 25 (n = 30), and Group 20 (n = 30). Supraclavicular blocks were performed with 1% mepivacaine 35 ml, 30 ml, 25 ml, and 20 ml, respectively. The success rate, onset time, and complications were checked and evaluated.

Results: The success rate (66.7%) was lower in Group 20 than that of Group 35 (96.7%) (P < 0.05). The average onset times of Group 35, Group 30, Group 25, and Group 20 were 14.3 ± 6.9 min, 13.6 ± 4.5 min, 16.7 ± 4.6 min, and 16.5 ± 3.7 min, respectively. There were no significant differences. Horner's syndrome was higher in Group 35 (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: In conclusion, we achieved 90% success rate with 30 ml of 1% mepivacaine. Therefore, we suggest 30 ml of local anesthetic volume for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block.

Citing Articles

A randomised trial comparing block characteristics of a mixture versus sequential injections of lignocaine and ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block in patients undergoing upper limb surgery.

Dhar M, Talawar P, Sharma S, Tripathy D, Gupta V, Varshney P Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(6):540-546.

PMID: 38903255 PMC: 11186534. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1122_23.


Ultrasonographic evaluation of incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis following different volumes of supraclavicular brachial plexus block- A prospective randomized double blinded study.

Johnson J, Daniel S Saudi J Anaesth. 2022; 16(1):58-64.

PMID: 35261590 PMC: 8846228. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_568_21.

References
1.
Kuruba S, Singh S . Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 106(4):600-1. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer044. View

2.
Kapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K, FitzGerald R, Gosch M, Weinstabl C . Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg. 1994; 78(3):507-13. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199403000-00016. View

3.
Orebaugh S, Williams B, Bigeleisen P . The up-down methodology and practical peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010; 35(5):480-1. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181f02b46. View

4.
Sites B, Beach M, Spence B, Wiley C, Shiffrin J, Hartman G . Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of a perivascular axillary plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006; 50(6):678-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01042.x. View

5.
Stone M, Wang R, Price D . Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block vs procedural sedation for the treatment of upper extremity emergencies. Am J Emerg Med. 2008; 26(6):706-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.09.011. View