» Articles » PMID: 16911142

What Are the Key Attributes of Primary Care for Patients? Building a Conceptual 'map' of Patient Preferences

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2006 Aug 17
PMID 16911142
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Responding to the preferences of patients is a key focus of current health policy and is especially important in primary care. Responding effectively to patient preferences requires a clear understanding of the way in which patients assess primary care services.

Objective: This study was designed to provide a 'map' of the content and structure of the key attributes of patient preferences concerning primary care.

Design: The development of the 'map' used secondary research methods. Electronic databases were searched for published conceptual reviews of patient preferences, which were used to develop a basic 'map' through content analysis. A search for recently published primary empirical studies of patient preferences was conducted to extend and develop the 'map'. The 'map' was tested by taking a random sample of patient assessment instruments and categorizing the item content.

Results: Seven major categories and multiple subcategories were described. The major categories were access, technical care, interpersonal care, patient-centredness, continuity, outcomes, and hotel aspects of care. The coverage of these attributes in a selection of patient assessment instruments varied widely, and the coding of a proportion of items in the patient assessment instruments according to the 'map' was problematic.

Conclusions: The conceptual 'map' can be used to plan comprehensive assessment of patient preferences in primary care. It also raises many theoretical issues concerning the nature of attributes and their interrelationships. The implications for the measurement of patient preferences are discussed.

Citing Articles

Expanding first-line options for depression: Protocol of a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial of yoga vs. behavioral activation (the COMPARE study).

Sylvia L, Busch A, Rabideau D, Gold A, Danhauer S, Schatten H PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315506.

PMID: 39761255 PMC: 11703115. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315506.


Empathy is not so perfect! -For a descriptive and wide conception of empathy.

Malbois E, Hurst-Majno S Med Health Care Philos. 2022; 26(1):85-97.

PMID: 36380157 PMC: 9984513. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-022-10124-w.


System- and Individual-Level Barriers to Accessing Medical Care Services Across the Rural-Urban Spectrum, Washington State.

Graves J, Abshire D, Alejandro A Health Serv Insights. 2022; 15:11786329221104667.

PMID: 35706424 PMC: 9189527. DOI: 10.1177/11786329221104667.


DBS-Edmonton App, a Tool to Manage Patient Expectations of DBS in Parkinson Disease.

Yen K, Miyasaki J, Waldron M, Yu L, Sankar T, Ba F Neurol Clin Pract. 2021; 11(3):e308-e316.

PMID: 34484906 PMC: 8382347. DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000962.


Headache service quality evaluation: implementation of quality indicators in primary care in Europe.

Lenz B, Katsarava Z, Gil-Gouveia R, Karelis G, Kaynarkaya B, Meksa L J Headache Pain. 2021; 22(1):33.

PMID: 33910500 PMC: 8080333. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01236-4.


References
1.
Burkitt Wright E, Holcombe C, Salmon P . Doctors' communication of trust, care, and respect in breast cancer: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004; 328(7444):864. PMC: 387476. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38046.771308.7C. View

2.
Steine S, Finset A, Laerum E . A new, brief questionnaire (PEQ) developed in primary health care for measuring patients' experience of interaction, emotion and consultation outcome. Fam Pract. 2001; 18(4):410-8. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/18.4.410. View

3.
Bower P, Roland M, Campbell J, Mead N . Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey. BMJ. 2003; 326(7383):258. PMC: 140766. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7383.258. View

4.
Safran D, Kosinski M, TARLOV A, Rogers W, Taira D, Lieberman N . The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care. 1998; 36(5):728-39. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199805000-00012. View

5.
Nathorst-Boos J, Munck I, Eckerlund I . An evaluation of the QSP and the QPP: two methods for measuring patient satisfaction. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001; 13(3):257-64. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/13.3.257. View