» Articles » PMID: 28697796

Patients' Preferences for Primary Health Care - a Systematic Literature Review of Discrete Choice Experiments

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Jul 13
PMID 28697796
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Primary care is a key element of health care systems and addresses the main health problems of the population. Due to the demographic change, primary care even gains in importance. The knowledge of the patients' preferences can help policy makers as well as physicians to set priorities in their effort to make health care delivery more responsive to patients' needs. Our objective was to describe which aspects of primary care were included in preference studies and which of them were the most preferred aspects.

Methods: In order to elicit the preferences for primary care, a systematic literature search was conducted. Two researchers searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO) and conducted a narrative synthesis. Inclusion criteria were: focus on primary health care delivery, discrete choice experiment as elicitation method, and studies published between 2006 and 2015 in English language.

Results: We identified 18 studies that elicited either the patients' or the population's preferences for primary care based on a discrete choice experiment. Altogether the studies used 16 structure attributes, ten process attributes and four outcome attributes. The most commonly applied structure attribute was "Waiting time till appointment", the most frequently used process attribute was "Shared decision making / professional's attention paid to your views". "Receiving the 'best' treatment" was the most commonly applied outcome attribute. Process attributes were most often the ones of highest importance for patients or the population. The attributes and attribute levels used in the discrete choice experiments were identified by literature research, qualitative research, expert interviews, or the analysis of policy documents.

Conclusions: The results of the DCE studies show different preferences for primary health care. The diversity of the results may have several reasons, such as the method of analysis, the selection procedure of the attributes and their levels or the specific research question of the study. As the results of discrete choice experiments depend on many different factors, it is important for a better comprehensibility of the studies to transparently report the steps undertaken in a study as well as the interim results regarding the identification of attributes and levels.

Citing Articles

Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making-Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare.

Fohn Z Health Expect. 2025; 28(1):e70060.

PMID: 39907194 PMC: 11795417. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70060.


Preference for community health services in people with chronic diseases: a discrete choice experiment in China.

Wang K, Yang Q, Wan L, An J Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1479237.

PMID: 39635215 PMC: 11614736. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1479237.


Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries-a protocol for systematic review of literature.

Hasan M, Webb E, Quayyum Z, Ensor T Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):285.

PMID: 39578898 PMC: 11583408. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02714-x.


Treatment preferences of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer: A discrete choice experiment.

Mannion L, Watson V, Mullassery V, Nair R, Charlton T, Northover M BJUI Compass. 2024; 5(11):1059-1068.

PMID: 39539556 PMC: 11557266. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.443.


What do Iranians value most when choosing a hospital? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

Ranjbar M, Bazyar M, Pahlevanshamsi F, Angell B, Assefa Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0293241.

PMID: 39418239 PMC: 11486428. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293241.


References
1.
Rubin G, Bate A, George A, Shackley P, Hall N . Preferences for access to the GP: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract. 2006; 56(531):743-8. PMC: 1920713. View

2.
Ahmed A, Fincham J . Patients' view of retail clinics as a source of primary care: boon for nurse practitioners?. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011; 23(4):193-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00577.x. View

3.
Gerard K, Tinelli M, Latter S, Blenkinsopp A, Smith A . Valuing the extended role of prescribing pharmacist in general practice: results from a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012; 15(5):699-707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.006. View

4.
Bridges J, Hauber A, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser L, Regier D . Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011; 14(4):403-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. View

5.
Kincey J, Bradshaw P, Ley P . Patients' satisfaction and reported acceptance of advice in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975; 25(157):558-66. PMC: 2157721. View