» Articles » PMID: 9723853

Which Aspects of General Practitioners' Behaviour Determine Patients' Evaluations of Care?

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 1998 Sep 2
PMID 9723853
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This qualitative study explored those behaviours of a general practitioner which were used by patients in their evaluations of 14 aspects of general practice care. Thirty patients were interviewed immediately after visiting their general practitioner. Interview transcripts were analyzed by two authors, who independently marked general practitioners' behaviours used by patients. Then, these text fragments were categorised into task or affective behaviours according to an existing taxonomy of doctor behaviour in consultations. The results showed that patients reported using task oriented behaviours when they evaluated task oriented aspects of general practice care. However, when they evaluated affective aspects they reported using both affective behaviours and task behaviours, although the latter to a lesser extent. The evaluations of "tell you all you wanted to know about your illness", "explain the purpose and the course of the treatment", "pay attention to your feelings" and "kind and attentive" are clearly linked to specific general practitioners' behaviour. Therefore, evaluations of these aspects can be interpreted straightforwardly. Evaluation of the aspects "GP understands you", "having faith in your GP" and "were you involved in decisions about your medical treatment?" were based on a large variety of physician behaviours which may lead to interpretation problems. Thus, this study gives some important considerations for a better understanding of patients' evaluations of general practice care.

Citing Articles

Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Celiac Disease Care.

Faye A, Mahadev S, Lebwohl B, Green P J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 52(1):30-35.

PMID: 27918311 PMC: 5453846. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000745.


What do older people value when they visit their general practitioner? A qualitative study.

Marcinowicz L, Pawlikowska T, Oleszczyk M Eur J Ageing. 2014; 11(4):361-367.

PMID: 25431547 PMC: 4240907. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-014-0313-0.


Differences in the quality of interpersonal care in complementary and conventional medicine.

Busato A, Kunzi B BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010; 10:63.

PMID: 21050450 PMC: 2987773. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-10-63.


Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology.

Marcinowicz L, Chlabicz S, Grebowski R BMC Health Serv Res. 2009; 9:63.

PMID: 19371417 PMC: 2678111. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-63.


How patients perceive the therapeutic communications skills of their general practitioners, and how that perception affects adherence: use of the TCom-skill GP scale in a specific geographical area.

Baumann M, Baumann C, le Bihan E, Chau N BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8:244.

PMID: 19046433 PMC: 2612661. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-244.