» Articles » PMID: 16896272

Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002 According to Different Defining Criteria

Overview
Date 2006 Aug 10
PMID 16896272
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The authors studied the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) according to the World Health Organization, National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definitions. There was 92.9% agreement between the NCEP and IDF definitions. The IDF prevalence was higher (p = 0.001) due to more men fulfilling its criteria than the NCEP's (39.9 +/- 1.7% vs. 33.6 +/- 1.6%; p = 0.007). If central obesity were not a prerequisite, the IDF prevalence would increase slightly to 40.3 +/- 1.1%. Subjects categorized as having the metabolic syndrome under IDF but not NCEP tended to be men, younger, and leaner. Their prevalence of self-reported coronary heart disease was not significantly different from that of other metabolic syndrome patients. Whether waist circumference is a prerequisite does not affect the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome in the United States. The IDF definition identifies additional individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Metabolic Syndrome among Non-Diabetic Saudi Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Eldakhakhny B, Enani S, Jambi H, Ajabnoor G, Al-Ahmadi J, Al-Raddadi R Biomedicines. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38137464 PMC: 10740949. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123242.


Prevalence of Childhood Obesity in the United States in 1999-2018: A 20-Year Analysis.

Tsoi M, Li H, Feng Q, Cheung C, Cheung T, Cheung B Obes Facts. 2022; 15(4):560-569.

PMID: 35358970 PMC: 9421675. DOI: 10.1159/000524261.


Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome.

Wang H, Lee D, Liu M, Portincasa P, Wang D Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2020; 23(3):189-230.

PMID: 32483543 PMC: 7231748. DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2020.23.3.189.


Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among ethnic groups in China.

Qin X, Qiu L, Tang G, Tsoi M, Xu T, Zhang L BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):297.

PMID: 32143667 PMC: 7060543. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8393-6.


Cardiorespiratory Fitness Is Inversely Associated With Clustering of Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors: The Ball State Adult Fitness Program Longitudinal Lifestyle Study.

Kelley E, Imboden M, Harber M, Finch H, Kaminsky L, Whaley M Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018; 2(2):155-164.

PMID: 30225445 PMC: 6124330. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.03.001.


References
1.
Meigs J . Invited commentary: insulin resistance syndrome? Syndrome X? Multiple metabolic syndrome? A syndrome at all? Factor analysis reveals patterns in the fabric of correlated metabolic risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152(10):908-11; discussion 912. DOI: 10.1093/aje/152.10.908. View

2.
Ford E . Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation among adults in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(11):2745-9. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2745. View

3.
Stern M, Williams K, Gonzalez-Villalpando C, Hunt K, Haffner S . Does the metabolic syndrome improve identification of individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease?. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(11):2676-81. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2676. View

4.
Cheung B, Ong K, Man Y, Lam K, Lau C . Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension: United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2002. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006; 8(2):93-8. PMC: 8109484. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.04895.x. View

5.
Ford E, Giles W . A comparison of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome using two proposed definitions. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(3):575-81. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.575. View