» Articles » PMID: 16868175

Heavy Metal Pad Shielding During Fluoroscopic Interventions

Overview
Date 2006 Jul 27
PMID 16868175
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significant direct and scatter radiation doses to patient and physician may result from routine interventional radiology practice. A lead-free disposable tungsten antimony shielding pad was tested in phantom patients during simulated diagnostic angiography procedures. Although the exact risk of low doses of ionizing radiation is unknown, dramatic dose reductions can be seen with routine use of this simple, sterile pad made from lightweight tungsten antimony material.

Citing Articles

Development of Lead-Free Materials for Radiation Shielding in Medical Settings: A Review.

Safari A, Rafie P, Taeb S, Najafi M, Mortazavi S J Biomed Phys Eng. 2024; 14(3):229-244.

PMID: 39027711 PMC: 11252547. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2404-1742.


Assessing the Efficacy of RADPAD Protection Drape in Reducing Radiation Exposure to Operators in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bahar A, Khanal R, Hamza M, Goru R, Shafiq A, Haider M Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e59215.

PMID: 38807800 PMC: 11132176. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59215.


Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology.

Garg T, Shrigiriwar A Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2022; 31(4):939-945.

PMID: 35136507 PMC: 8817818. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741049.


Does nonexistent of your hands on the screen guarantee no radiation exposure to your body? - Study on exposure of the practitioner's hands to radiation during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided injections and effectiveness of a new shielding device.

Lee J, Kim J, Lee S, Kim M, Nam T, Kim C Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(46):e17959.

PMID: 31725656 PMC: 6867788. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017959.


A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of the effect of a radiation-attenuating drape on radiation exposure to endoscopy staff during ERCP.

Muniraj T, Aslanian H, Laine L, Farrell J, Ciarleglio M, Deng Y Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110(5):690-6.

PMID: 25823765 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.85.


References
1.
ANDERSON J, Wang J, Clarke G . Choice of phantom material and test protocols to determine radiation exposure rates for fluoroscopy. Radiographics. 2000; 20(4):1033-42. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl051033. View

2.
Valentin J . Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP. 2001; 30(2):7-67. DOI: 10.1016/S0146-6453(01)00004-5. View

3.
Mahesh M . Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics. 2001; 21(4):1033-45. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl271033. View

4.
King J, Champlin A, Kelsey C, Tripp D . Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178(1):153-7. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.1.1780153. View

5.
Botwin K, Thomas S, Gruber R, Torres F, Bouchlas C, Rittenberg J . Radiation exposure of the spinal interventionalist performing fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(5):697-701. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32439. View