» Articles » PMID: 16826001

Postoperative Change of the Cross-sectional Area of Back Musculature After 5 Surgical Procedures As Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Jul 11
PMID 16826001
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many investigators have reported that persistent low back pain may occur after posterior surgical intervention, and studies have investigated the histologic and histochemical changes in back muscle after posterior lumbar spine surgery. The purpose of the current study is to compare the pre- and postoperative cross-sectional area of the back musculature among 5 surgical groups including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, which has no direct invasion of the back musculature, using magnetic resonance imaging, and to correlate the clinical results with the degree of atrophy. The cross-sectional area of the back musculature was measured before and after surgery in T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance images using a computer-linked digitizer. The degree of atrophy (atrophy ratio) was calculated as a ratio of the postoperative cross-sectional area to the preoperative cross-sectional area. Clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association's scores for the management of low back pain. Atrophy of the back musculature was confirmed in each group. However, no significant difference was seen in the atrophy ratio between the groups. Back musculature atrophy occurred even in anterior lumbar interbody fusion, which does not involve any direct surgery of the back muscle. A positive correlation was noted between the atrophy ratio and operation time only in posterior surgery, especially in nonfusion surgery. In conclusion, the current study suggests that a shorter operation time may minimize back muscle injury, and shows that factors inducing back musculature atrophy include not only direct invasion of the back muscle via a posterior approach, but also postoperative external fixation.

Citing Articles

Predictors and Postoperative Complication Risks for Revision Discectomies Following Primary Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

Ton A, Avetisian H, Han J, Mertz K, Shontz E, Hang N Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251323274.

PMID: 39993412 PMC: 11851590. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251323274.


Qualitative Evaluation of Paraspinal Musculature After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Study.

Soares R, Astur N, Rabello de Oliveira L, Kanas M, Wajchenberg M, Martins D Int J Spine Surg. 2024; 18(4):448-454.

PMID: 39187296 PMC: 11483563. DOI: 10.14444/8631.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Multifidus Muscle in Patients with Low Back Pain after Microlumbar Discectomy Surgery.

Kose H, Aydin S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37834767 PMC: 10573099. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196122.


Effect of gluteal muscle strengthening exercise on sagittal balance and muscle volume in adult spinal deformity following long-segment fixation surgery.

Lee K, Lee J, Im S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9063.

PMID: 35641598 PMC: 9156705. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13190-5.


Effect of Protein Supplement on Paraspinal Muscles in Spine Fusion Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Khalooeifard R, Vahdat Shariatpanahi Z, Ahani A, Keykhaee M, Oraee-Yazdani M, Zali A Int J Spine Surg. 2021; 15(1):47-54.

PMID: 33900956 PMC: 7931746. DOI: 10.14444/8005.