» Articles » PMID: 37834767

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Multifidus Muscle in Patients with Low Back Pain After Microlumbar Discectomy Surgery

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Oct 14
PMID 37834767
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cross-sectional area (CSA) and signal intensity ratio (SIR) of the multifidus muscle (MFM) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the extent of injury and atrophy of the MFM in patients with negative treatment outcomes following microlumbar discectomy (MLD). Negative treatment outcome was determined by pain score improvement of <50% compared to baseline. Patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 were evaluated at <4 weeks, 4-24 weeks, and >24 weeks postoperatively, respectively. The associations between the follow-up, surgery time and the changes in the MFM were evaluated. A total of 79 patients were included, with 22, 27, and 30 subjects in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The MFM SIR of the ipsilateral side had significantly decreased in groups 2 ( = 0.001) and 3 ( < 0.001). The ipsilateral MFM CSA significantly decreased postoperatively in groups 2 ( = 0.04) and 3 ( = 0.006). The postoperative MRI scans found significant MFM changes on the ipsilateral side in patients with negative treatment outcomes regarding pain intensity following MLD. As the interval to the postoperative MRI scan increased, the changes in CSA of the MFM and change in T2 SIR of the MFM showed a tendency to increase.

Citing Articles

Effects of a new continuous nursing program on the short-term and long-term low back pain in patients after UBED: a retrospective study based on 282 patients.

Li J, Song Y, Wu L, Su D, Wang L Front Surg. 2024; 11:1443231.

PMID: 39268492 PMC: 11390385. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1443231.

References
1.
Tsutsumimoto T, Shimogata M, Ohta H, Misawa H . Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(18):1923-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9d28e. View

2.
Datta G, Gnanalingham K, Peterson D, Mendoza N, ONeill K, Van Dellen J . Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction?. Neurosurgery. 2004; 54(6):1413-20. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000124751.57121.a6. View

3.
Laasonen E . Atrophy of sacrospinal muscle groups in patients with chronic, diffusely radiating lumbar back pain. Neuroradiology. 1984; 26(1):9-13. DOI: 10.1007/BF00328195. View

4.
Rosatelli A, Ravichandiran K, Agur A . Three-dimensional study of the musculotendinous architecture of lumbar multifidus and its functional implications. Clin Anat. 2008; 21(6):539-46. DOI: 10.1002/ca.20659. View

5.
Silverplats K, Lind B, Zoega B, Halldin K, Rutberg L, Gellerstedt M . Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(9):1459-67. PMC: 2989281. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1433-7. View