» Articles » PMID: 27687823

Quality of Life and Disability: Can They Be Improved by Active Postoperative Rehabilitation After Spinal Fusion Surgery in Patients with Spondylolisthesis? A Randomised Controlled Trial with 12-month Follow-up

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Oct 1
PMID 27687823
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of the postoperative 12-month exercise program compared to usual care on disability and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients after lumbar spine fusion surgery (LSF).

Methods: Altogether, 98 patients with isthmic (31) or degenerative (67) spondylolisthesis were randomised to exercise therapy group (EG) (n = 48) or usual care group (UCG) (n = 50) 3 months after LSF. EG patients had home-based progressive strength and aerobic training program for 12 months. UCG patients received only oral and written instructions of exercises. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and HRQoL (RAND-36) were evaluated at the time of randomization, at the end of the intervention and 1 year after intervention.

Results: The mean ODI score decreased from 24 (12) to 18 (14) in the EG and from 18 (12) to 13 (11) in the UCG during intervention (between-groups p = 0.69). At 1-year follow-up, 25 % of the EG and 28 % of the UCG had an ODI score ≥20. No between-group differences in HRQoL change were found at any time point. The mean (95 % CI) physical functioning dimension of the HRQoL improved by 10.0 (4.6-15.3) in the EG and by 7.8 (2.5-13.0) in the UCG. In addition, the role physical score improved by 20.0 (7.7-32.3) in the EG and by 16.4 (4.4-28.4) in the UCG during the intervention.

Conclusions: The exercise intervention did not have an impact on disability or HRQoL beyond the improvement achieved by usual care. However, disability remained at least moderate in considerable proportion of patients.

Citing Articles

Effects of Supervised Rehabilitation on Psychosocial and Participation-Related Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Scandelli F, De Leo D, Marino G, De Martino E, Cannizzaro D, Adamo P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685705 PMC: 11642663. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237246.


Rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Manni T, Ferri N, Vanti C, Ferrari S, Cuoghi I, Gaeta C Arch Physiother. 2023; 13(1):21.

PMID: 37845718 PMC: 10578022. DOI: 10.1186/s40945-023-00175-4.


Rehabilitation after cervical and lumbar spine surgery.

Barbosa T, Raposo A, Cunha P, Cruz Oliveira N, Lobarinhas A, Varanda P EFORT Open Rev. 2023; 8(8):626-638.

PMID: 37526242 PMC: 10441252. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0015.


Effectiveness of the perioperative encounter in promoting regular exercise and physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pritchard M, Lewis S, Robinson A, Gibson S, Chuter A, Copeland R EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 57:101806.

PMID: 36816345 PMC: 9929685. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101806.


The treatment effect of posterior lumbar fusion surgery on patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation concurrent with peroneal nerve paralysis.

Gao S, Li Z, Li X, Rudd S, Wang H, Gao Z Front Surg. 2023; 9:1063528.

PMID: 36684276 PMC: 9852713. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1063528.


References
1.
Tarnanen S, Neva M, Hakkinen K, Kankaanpaa M, Ylinen J, Kraemer W . Neutral spine control exercises in rehabilitation after lumbar spine fusion. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 28(7):2018-25. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000334. View

2.
Pekkanen L, Kautiainen H, Ylinen J, Salo P, Hakkinen A . Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version 2.0 of the oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 36(4):332-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cdd702. View

3.
Tarnanen S, Neva M, Dekker J, Hakkinen K, Vihtonen K, Pekkanen L . Randomized controlled trial of postoperative exercise rehabilitation program after lumbar spine fusion: study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13:123. PMC: 3436790. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-123. View

4.
Soegaard R, Christensen F, Lauerberg I, Lauersen I, Bunger C . Lumbar spinal fusion patients' demands to the primary health sector: evaluation of three rehabilitation protocols. A prospective randomized study. Eur Spine J. 2005; 15(5):648-56. PMC: 3489345. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0884-8. View

5.
Smeets R, Wittink H, Hidding A, Knottnerus J . Do patients with chronic low back pain have a lower level of aerobic fitness than healthy controls?: are pain, disability, fear of injury, working status, or level of leisure time activity associated with the difference in aerobic fitness level?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(1):90-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000192641.22003.83. View