» Articles » PMID: 16812533

Effects of Magnitude of Food Reinforcement on Free-operant Response Rates

Overview
Date 1988 Jan 1
PMID 16812533
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In Experiment 1 rats were trained to press a lever on a variable-ratio schedule of food presentation and were then exposed to progressively increasing magnitudes of food reinforcement. Response running rates (rates exclusive of the postreinforcement pause) were found to increase as a function of increasing reinforcement magnitudes. The effect of reinforcement magnitude on response rates inclusive of the postreinforcement pause, however, was less pronounced. Increases in the magnitude of reinforcement were also found to increase the length of the postreinforcement pause. Rats in Experiment 2 were trained to respond on a chained differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate variable-ratio schedule, and were exposed to increasing magnitudes of reinforcement as in Experiment 1. Response running rates increased in the variable-ratio component but decreased in the other component of the schedule. The results are discussed with reference to incentive accounts of reinforcement and the action of reinforcement on the response units generated by the operative contingencies.

Citing Articles

Reward-enhancing effects of d-amphetamine and its interactions with nicotine were greater in female rats and persisted across schedules of reinforcement.

McNealy K, Ramsay M, Barrett S, Bevins R Behav Pharmacol. 2021; 32(5):435-447.

PMID: 34010168 PMC: 8266728. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000637.


Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.

Leon Y, Borrero J, DeLeon I J Appl Behav Anal. 2016; 49(3):639-55.

PMID: 27174440 PMC: 5023462. DOI: 10.1002/jaba.311.


Operant conditioning of primate prefrontal neurons.

Kobayashi S, Schultz W, Sakagami M J Neurophysiol. 2010; 103(4):1843-55.

PMID: 20107129 PMC: 2853276. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00173.2009.


Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.

Trosclair-Lasserre N, Lerman D, Call N, Addison L, Kodak T J Appl Behav Anal. 2008; 41(2):203-20.

PMID: 18595284 PMC: 2408337. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-203.


Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rates.

Reed P J Exp Anal Behav. 1991; 55(1):109-23.

PMID: 16812628 PMC: 1322981. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-109.


References
1.
KEESEY R, Kling J . Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:125-32. PMC: 1404051. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-125. View

2.
Cruse D, Vitulli W, Dertke M . Discriminative and reinforcing properties of two types of food pellets. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966; 9(3):293-303. PMC: 1338196. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-293. View

3.
Powell R . The effect of reinforcement magnitude upon responding under fixed-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(4):605-8. PMC: 1338655. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-605. View

4.
Baum W . The correlation-based law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973; 20(1):137-53. PMC: 1334111. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137. View

5.
Richardson W . A test of the effectiveness of the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973; 20(3):385-91. PMC: 1334162. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-385. View