» Articles » PMID: 9163938

Running and Responding Reinforced by the Opportunity to Run: Effect of Reinforcer Duration

Overview
Date 1997 May 1
PMID 9163938
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of reinforcer duration on running and on responding reinforced by the opportunity to run. Eleven male Wistar rats responded on levers for the opportunity to run in a running wheel. Opportunities to run were programmed to occur on a tandem fixed-ratio 1 variable-interval 30-s reinforcement schedule. Reinforcer duration varied across conditions from 30 to 120 s. As reinforcer duration increased, the rates of running and lever pressing declined, and latency to lever press increased. The increase in latency to respond was consistent with findings that unconditioned inhibitory aftereffects of reinforcement increase with reinforcer magnitude. The decrease in local lever-pressing rates, however, was inconsistent with the view that response strength increases with the duration of the reinforcer. Response rate varied inversely, not directly, with reinforcer duration. Furthermore, within-session data challenge satiation, fatigue, and response deprivation as determinants of the observed changes in running and responding. In sum, the results point to the need for further research with nonappetitive forms of reinforcement.

Citing Articles

Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Reveals Enduring Signatures of Acute Stress and Chronic Exercise in Striatal Microglia.

Connolly M, Johnson Z, Chu L, Johnson N, Buhr T, McNeill E Genes Brain Behav. 2025; 24(2):e70019.

PMID: 40045485 PMC: 11882474. DOI: 10.1111/gbb.70019.


Altered motivation states for physical activity and 'appetite' for movement as compensatory mechanisms limiting the efficacy of exercise training for weight loss.

Flack K, Stults-Kolehmainen M, Creasy S, Khullar S, Boullosa D, Catenacci V Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1098394.

PMID: 37187558 PMC: 10176969. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098394.


Exercise against cocaine sensitization in mice: a [F]fallypride micro-PET study.

Becker G, Lespine L, Bahri M, Serrano M, Lemaire C, Luxen A Brain Commun. 2022; 4(1):fcab294.

PMID: 35169698 PMC: 8833578. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab294.


Comparing the reinforcing value of high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise in sedentary adults.

Epstein L, ODonnell S, Biondolillo M, Hostler D, Roemmich J Physiol Behav. 2021; 238:113468.

PMID: 34033846 PMC: 9667389. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113468.


An Operant Conditioning Task to Assess the Choice between Wheel Running and Palatable Food in Mice.

Redon B, Hurel I, Marsicano G, Chaouloff F Bio Protoc. 2021; 9(19):e3381.

PMID: 33654877 PMC: 7853937. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3381.


References
1.
Priddle-Higson P, Lowe C, Harzem P . Aftereffects of reinforcement on variable-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976; 25(3):347-54. PMC: 1333473. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-347. View

2.
Herrnstein R . On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13(2):243-66. PMC: 1333768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. View

3.
Allison J . Response deprivation, reinforcement, and economics. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 60(1):129-140. PMC: 1322150. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-129. View

4.
Iversen I . Techniques for establishing schedules with wheel running as reinforcement in rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 60(1):219-38. PMC: 1322156. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-219. View

5.
FLESHLER M, Hoffman H . A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962; 5:529-30. PMC: 1404199. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. View