» Articles » PMID: 16812464

Delayed Reinforcement and Delayed Choice in Symbolic Matching to Sample: Effects on Stimulus Discriminability

Overview
Date 1986 Nov 1
PMID 16812464
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Six pigeons were trained to peck a red side key when the brighter of two white lights (S(1)) had been presented on the center key, and to peck a green side key when the dimmer of two white lights (S(2)) had been presented on the center key. Equal frequencies of reinforcers were provided for the two types of correct choice. Incorrect choices, red side-key pecks following S(2) presentations and green side-key pecks following S(1) presentations, resulted in blackout. With 0-s delay between choice and reinforcement, the delay between sample presentation and choice was varied from 0 to 20 s. Then, with 0-s delay between sample presentation and choice, the delay between choice and reinforcement was varied from 0 to 20 s. Both types of delay resulted in decreased discriminability (defined in terms of a signal-detection analysis) of the center-key stimuli, but delayed choice had more effect on discriminability than did delayed reinforcement. These data are consistent with the view that the two kinds of delay operate differently. The effect of a sample-choice delay may result from a degradation of the conditional discriminative stimuli during the delay; the effect of a choice-reinforcer delay may result from a decrement in control by differential reinforcement.

Citing Articles

Seven neurons memorizing sequences of alphabetical images via spike-timing dependent plasticity.

Osogami T, Otsuka M Sci Rep. 2015; 5:14149.

PMID: 26374672 PMC: 4570975. DOI: 10.1038/srep14149.


Pramipexole-induced disruption of behavioral processes fundamental to intertemporal choice.

Johnson P, Stein J, Smits R, Madden G J Exp Anal Behav. 2013; 99(3):290-317.

PMID: 23436721 PMC: 4161207. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.21.


Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.

Alsop B, Jones B J Exp Anal Behav. 2008; 89(3):311-31.

PMID: 18540217 PMC: 2373768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-311.


Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.

Sargisson R, Geoffrey White K Learn Behav. 2007; 35(3):177-83.

PMID: 17918423 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193053.


Delayed matching-to-sample performance: Effects of relative reinforcer frequency and of signaled versus unsignaled reinforcer magnitudes.

McCarthy D, Voss P J Exp Anal Behav. 1995; 63(1):33-51.

PMID: 16812751 PMC: 1334379. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-33.


References
1.
Davison M, Tustin R . The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(2):331-6. PMC: 1332761. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-331. View

2.
Stubbs D, Pliskoff S . Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(6):887-95. PMC: 1338698. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887. View

3.
Stubbs D . Response bias and the discrimination of stimulus duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976; 25(2):243-50. PMC: 1333456. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-243. View

4.
Baum W . On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 22(1):231-42. PMC: 1333261. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. View

5.
Harnett P, McCarthy D, Davison M . Delayed signal detection, differential reinforcement, and short-term memory in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 42(1):87-111. PMC: 1348047. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-87. View