» Articles » PMID: 13677610

The Effect of Reinforcer Delays on the Form of the Forgetting Function

Overview
Date 2003 Sep 19
PMID 13677610
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pigeons were trained in a matching-to-sample procedure with retention intervals of 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 s mixed within each session. In different conditions, reinforcement was delayed by 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 s from correct choice responses. Discriminability decreased with increasing retention-interval duration and with increasing reinforcer delay. Exponential forgetting functions were fitted to discriminability measures plotted as a function of retention interval. Initial discriminability (intercept of the fitted functions) decreased with increasing reinforcer delay. Rate of forgetting (slope of the fitted functions) increased with reinforcer delay, suggesting an interaction between the effects of reinforcer delay and retention interval. The data were well described by multiplying an exponential function describing the effects of retention interval by a hyperbolic function describing the effect of reinforcer delay. This description included an interaction term that allowed for a greater effect of reinforcer delay at longer retention intervals.

Citing Articles

Remembering as an operant: Effects of instructional control and reinforcement on remembering behavior.

de Olives V, Polin E, Perez V Learn Behav. 2024; .

PMID: 39394340 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-024-00653-0.


Metacognition in animals.

Crystal J, Foote A Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2015; 4:1-16.

PMID: 26516391 PMC: 4621963. DOI: 10.3819/ccbr.2009.40001.


Effect of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance in individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Hayashi Y, Hall S, Williams D Behav Processes. 2013; 96:88-92.

PMID: 23523782 PMC: 3657314. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.005.


Seasonal variation in pigeon body weight and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Sargisson R, McLean I, Brown G, Geoffrey White K J Exp Anal Behav. 2007; 88(3):395-404.

PMID: 18047229 PMC: 2174378. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-395.


A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Nevin J, Davison M, Odum A, Shahan T J Exp Anal Behav. 2007; 88(2):285-317.

PMID: 17970420 PMC: 1986439. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-285.


References
1.
Wixted J . Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989; 52(3):409-26. PMC: 1339192. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-409. View

2.
Sargisson R, White K . Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001; 75(1):1-14. PMC: 1284804. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-1. View

3.
Davison M, Nevin J . Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006; 71(3):439-82. PMC: 1284721. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-439. View

4.
White K, McKenzie J . Delayed stimulus control: recall for single and relational stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982; 38(3):305-12. PMC: 1347869. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-305. View

5.
Geoffrey White K . Temporal generalization and diffusion in forgetting. Behav Processes. 2002; 57(2-3):121-129. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00009-8. View